Can somebody help a moron posts some pictures?

Cormanus_imp said:
FLYTM, Postimage is a great image hosting site, I reckon. Way better than Flickr for the purposes of sharing photos easily. I can find a way to share your Flickr image, but it's tricky and requires calling up the page source code. But it works:

fa0b4a4b45a8bc04576deea4ad2e3c40.jpg


Do you get the advice popgun and KiowaEagle are giving you about not being able to use both http:// and https:// together? It will be one or the other. Most times these days, particularly with commercial sites it will be https://.

Anyway, none of that matters with Postimage.

If you follow your link, CB628B71 AC84 4D8B B150 25DBFE68EC96 — Postimages, you'll see this screen:



Click (1) on <Share> and you'll see this:

[url=https://postimg.cc/LYBQg9LX]

Click (2) on the little icon at the end of the box that says <Hotlink for forums>. This will copy the information you need to the clipboard of your device. Then go to your post and select paste. On the screen, you'll see something like:

Code:
[url=https://postimages.org/]
But, when you post or preview your post, you should see this:

[url=https://postimages.org/]

By way of explanation, the Forum software looks for 'tags' to tell it to do something special. It encloses those tags in square brackets [] and needs both an opening and closing tag. The closing tag will look like [/]. That tells the software to stop doing something. IMG is the tag you need to display pictures. So, if you type,

Code:

and 'A URL' displays a picture, the forum should display that picture. A word, though. If the URL does not end with '.jpg' or '.jpeg' or '.png' it is not likely to work. I've no idea why.

I hope that makes sense. Let me know if it doesn't.
KiowaEagle_imp said:
KiowaEagle_imp said:
FLYTYM_imp said:
I know this but which option to us on the option list after the picture in downloaded?
I know this but which option to us on the option list after the picture in downloaded? Ok, I chose the post image icon and tried posting as http and https but each time it just comes out as below.

23b47e44718fe4ce362296845124f468.


I’m not sure why. Like I said before I use Tapatalk to post pics mainly because I find this process so infuriating....lol
KiowaEagle, see the information above. Your link (http://http//postimg.cc/qtktfg9q) won't work because it makes the same mistake as FLYTM's earlier link. It also won't work because the link is to a page CONTAINING a picture rather than to the picture itself.
I have to absent myself for a wee while, but I'll be back later and can answer more questions.
Interesting, it must add the http:// without showing you. Good to know.
 
OK, Flytm, this is weird. What interface are you using to access Postimage? I can't for the life of me figure how you're generating those links.

Here is the image you tried to post above.


KiowaEagle_imp said:
KiowaEagle_imp said:
Cormanus_imp said:
you'll see this screen:



Click (1) on <Share> and you'll see this:

[url=https://postimg.cc/LYBQg9LX]

Click (2) on the little icon at the end of the box that says <Hotlink for forums>. This will copy the information you need to the clipboard of your device. Then go to your post and select paste. On the screen, you'll see something like:

Code:
[url=https://postimages.org/]
But, when you post or preview your post, you should see this:

[url=https://postimages.org/]

By way of explanation, the Forum software looks for 'tags' to tell it to do something special. It encloses those tags in square brackets [] and needs both an opening and closing tag. The closing tag will look like [/]. That tells the software to stop doing something. IMG is the tag you need to display pictures. So, if you type,

Code:

and 'A URL' displays a picture, the forum should display that picture. A word, though. If the URL does not end with '.jpg' or '.jpeg' or '.png' it is not likely to work. I've no idea why.

I hope that makes sense. Let me know if it doesn't.
KiowaEagle_imp said:
KiowaEagle_imp said:
FLYTYM_imp said:
I know this but which option to us on the option list after the picture in downloaded?
I know this but which option to us on the option list after the picture in downloaded? Ok, I chose the post image icon and tried posting as http and https but each time it just comes out as below.

23b47e44718fe4ce362296845124f468.


I’m not sure why. Like I said before I use Tapatalk to post pics mainly because I find this process so infuriating....lol
KiowaEagle, see the information above. Your link (http://http//postimg.cc/qtktfg9q) won't work because it makes the same mistake as FLYTM's earlier link. It also won't work because the link is to a page CONTAINING a picture rather than to the picture itself.
I have to absent myself for a wee while, but I'll be back later and can answer more questions.
Interesting, it must add the http:// without showing you. Good to know.
Interesting, it must add the http:// without showing you. Good to know.
If you're using the forum's <link to image> box, I think it may. I recall it behaves differently on a computer and a tablet/phone. On one—the tablet/phone, I think—you have to <select all> items in the text box and then paste in the new one. However, the odd thing about the link you posted earlier is that the colon after the 'https' has gone awol. Weird.
 
If you follow the instructions I gave above, you don’t need to click either icon, just paste what you’ve copied from Postimage. It contains the tags you need.
 
Hey here, FLYTM! Well done. You're away now. Us illiterates will now be able to look at the pictures rather than having to run our finger along under the line while we spell out the words. :thumbsup:
 
I think Cormanus has the most heavily toned headers based on posted images. His almost looks like brown-bronze anodized. To get there takes a lot of emotional tolerance, or at the other extreme, don't care at all, ... or just getting to the "I don't care" state-of-mind. Nevertheless, in that context they look quite good.
 
Thread starter
GoldOxide_imp said:
I think Cormanus has the most heavily toned headers based on posted images. His almost looks like brown-bronze anodized. To get there takes a lot of emotional tolerance, or at the other extreme, don't care at all, ... or just getting to the "I don't care" state-of-mind. Nevertheless, in that context they look quite good.
I don’t mind the fact that they will change over time. I got some black crap on the pipes and got some BLUE OFF I think what it is and the black spots did come off,but so did the tint on the pipes.
 
FLYTYM_imp said:
GoldOxide_imp said:
I think Cormanus has the most heavily toned headers based on posted images. His almost looks like brown-bronze anodized. To get there takes a lot of emotional tolerance, or at the other extreme, don't care at all, ... or just getting to the "I don't care" state-of-mind. Nevertheless, in that context they look quite good.
I don’t mind the fact that they will change over time. I got some black crap on the pipes and got some BLUE OFF I think what it is and the black spots did come off,but so did the tint on the pipes.
I don’t mind the fact that they will change over time. I got some black crap on the pipes and got some BLUE OFF I think what it is and the black spots did come off,but so did the tint on the pipes.
Oh man, a "clean spot". That just creates all sorts of imbalance issues for some people. A spot that reminds the rider, "Is that what my pipes are supposed to look like?". :-/
 
^^^ That raises an interesting question: what are the pipes ‘supposed’ to look like after 100,000 kilometres of riding? I’d suggest that if Honda had expected them to be sparkling chrome, they would have fitted the double walled chrome headers found on the DLX and 2017 models. It’s a pity they didn’t.
 
Pity -shmitty. I like that the 100,000km pipes look weathered. Plus I like to keep the things that are supposed to stay shiny shiny and if that included the header, then I'd have more shining to do. Screw that. :)
 
EmptySea_imp said:
Pity -shmitty. I like that the 100,000km pipes look weathered. Plus I like to keep the things that are supposed to stay shiny shiny and if that included the header, then I'd have more shining to do. Screw that. :)
I thought about this for, oh, a nanosecond or so. Hey, you're right, MTC! :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top