CBhooligan_imp
First service completed
Thread starter
I used the 2017 (rs model) grab bar for a cleaner look.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Hey there CBH your bike looks very cool. I'm curious about what your requirements (law) are for a red tail & stop light / registration plate illumination / turn signals.CBhooligan_imp said:I used the 2017 (rs model) grab bar for a cleaner look.
Hey there CBH your bike looks very cool. I'm curious about what your requirements (law) are for a red tail & stop light / registration plate illumination / turn signals.Aussieflyer_imp said:Hey there CBH your bike looks very cool. I'm curious about what your requirements (law) are for a red tail & stop light / registration plate illumination / turn signals.CBhooligan_imp said:I used the 2017 (rs model) grab bar for a cleaner look.
Cheers
AF
good idea!camoto_imp said:That looks fantastic, nice work. Did the 2017 bar mount right up or was modification required?
superjim_imp said:Where can I find a 2017 RS grab rail?
beardyweirdy@me.com_imp said:Nice one... Looks really good.
I used the '17 plastic part of the rear fender for a cleaner look too.
If you look at a '17 compared to previous models the plastic part of the rear fender fits closer to the frame and gives more space around the rear wheel. It's about an 1" to 2" but visually it looks far neater to me. It's a straight fit but you have to make a small cut out for the seat lock. The part costs about £60 in the UK. Not inexpensive but worth it if your a pedantic, nit picker ;-)


You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:DOT regulations infringement
![]()
You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.GoldOxide_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:DOT regulations infringement
![]()

You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.GoldOxide_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:DOT regulations infringement
![]()
Yeah, as invisible in water mist produced by rear wheel.. at 150 +![]()
You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.GoldOxide_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.GoldOxide_imp said:You know? - with a slight "flip" of innovation, that rear end would be productive on the Ontario 407 freeway.peterbaron_imp said:DOT regulations infringement
![]()
Yeah, as invisible in water mist produced by rear wheel.. at 150 +![]()
Yeah, as invisible in water mist produced by rear wheel.. at 150 +![]()
Indeed! But that would mean the rider would have to carry water. :dodgy:
