06-20-2014, 11:25 PM
Tripod (I used to have a mate who called himself that for his "screen" work!)
Whilst I am not answering your question, have a look at this table:
![[Image: a7076d8c26b6a09e228f420130fc94a0.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/201406/a7076d8c26b6a09e228f420130fc94a0.jpg)
No Mr Ferret please don't fret about copyright, I cut it out out from a free promotional publication over a year ago.
Anyway, given that the stroke on our bikes is shorter than the 1983 bike it should be capable of matching the revs. I appreciate that we are moving into cam shaft territory, that I for one certainly wouldn't want to move into for a number of years. But my point is to show the potential of where it could all go without being too extreme given time.
As to where we are now? Ridem and Cip will answer.
Cheers
Dengie
Whilst I am not answering your question, have a look at this table:
No Mr Ferret please don't fret about copyright, I cut it out out from a free promotional publication over a year ago.
Anyway, given that the stroke on our bikes is shorter than the 1983 bike it should be capable of matching the revs. I appreciate that we are moving into cam shaft territory, that I for one certainly wouldn't want to move into for a number of years. But my point is to show the potential of where it could all go without being too extreme given time.
As to where we are now? Ridem and Cip will answer.
Cheers
Dengie