Posts: 2,542
Threads: 125
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
I'm guessing that regardless of the way any of us choose to use our brakes, those who have been riding long enough on various bikes are certainly capable of telling when something "isn't right".
Hopefully a quick bleeding of the rear system takes care of it for those experiencing a lack of rear braking.
Posts: 23,403
Threads: 697
Likes Received: 482 in 220 posts
Likes Given: 597
Joined: Apr 2025
Well, in the video its clear he stopped faster using both brakes (rather than just front or just rear alone) in his controlled braking tests. Funny he said, "not much better than when using the front brake alone" after stopping with both....but it was better, and it was obvious. He also specified "on these sport bikes, over braking the front is the way to go". Wonder if thats how he would brake on a crusier? or a standard for that matter? How about in the rain, or if there is gravel, or a deer in the road?
However in his demo, thats what it looks like when I use my back brake alone, you just keep on going lol
Posts: 55
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
Cruisers have longer wheelbases and lower centers of gravity, which means less weight transfer to the front tire when braking compared to a sportbike (shorter wheelbase, higher COG). So Harley riders and other cruiser owners are accustomed to using the rear brake a lot, because the rear tire has more weight on it (and thus traction) and therefore is able to provide more braking power. The problem is that it's harder to modulate braking force with your foot than with your hand, and many cruiser riders just stomp on the rear brake pedal in an emergency, lock up the rear tire and crash. (Locking up the rear tire when braking is a very common cause of bike crashes.) Shortly after I bought my Hawk GT I had an older neighbor who warned me not to use the front brake because it would send me over the handlebars, it was the rear brake that was the correct one to use. He was set in his ways, there was no point in arguing with him about. Sigh...
So it's possible, given the target demographic of the CB1100 (older guys who may be coming off cruisers), that Honda deliberately made the rear brake a bit weaker than usual to make it hard for riders to accidentally lock up the rear wheel. That seems unlikely to me, but it's a possibility.
Posts: 1,846
Threads: 183
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
When approaching a blind intersection or approaching a stopped car at an interection, my hand is over the front, but my right foot usually isn't over the rear.
Posts: 7
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
no issues with vin 177 with ABS....2 weeks old, 900 miles...
Posts: 40
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
Non-ABS
VIN 126
Front and Rear work Just fine for me ....
Posts: 176
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
(08-05-2013, 10:59 AM)Jayimpalaman_imp Wrote: New update: Had my rear brakes bled today at dealer. Still have the SDS brake pads in. Rear brake will lock-up now. (BUT) you must use it hard. But, it will slide the rear tire now!! So I thank my Dealer (Kirk's cycle) in Dalton, Ga. and took the long way back to the house. It took them about 1 and 1/2 hours because they had a rush in the service department at the time. Open on Mondays. I was told that they would have to call Honda to see if anyone had complained about their rear brakes on their CB1100. No company wants a re-call now of days. I will keep everyone informed as the weeks go by on this brake issue. For now anyways, I will just see how it will do! Keep those posts coming! You never know what may happen.. If your CB1100 is not stopping like it should in the rear, talk to your dealer. It can't hurt. God Bless....
Jayimpalaman
Sounds like bleeding the line resolved the problem; I'm glad that your experiment indicates that you have to use the rear brake 'hard' before it locks, I wouldn't want the rear to lock if the pedal were depressed with 'medium' effort (some older rear drum brakes were unpredictable and exhibited that behavior).
Posts: 543
Threads: 7
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
I tried on the way to work today, not to lock it up, but rather to stop me from doing 40mph... I was able to stop myself with just the rear brake without any problems.
It was not comfortable to brake that way seeing how I was instructed many moons ago that the front brake does most of the work stopping you... But it is nice to know that the rear has stopping power if called upon.
Posts: 318
Threads: 7
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
(08-05-2013, 04:10 AM)dBuster_imp Wrote: Regarding the rear brakes, I think they do just fine. Have I locked them up? NO and I do not plan on locking them up. Like it was mentioned before, the rears are not for main stopping power on your bike.
hmm Lets see, rear brakes count for 30% of your braking power... The other 70% is supposed to come from the front...
If you are mainly using that rear brake for stopping... I removed my comment... *shaking my head though* 
(08-04-2013, 10:49 PM)thumper_imp Wrote: ABS--Never use the rear brake, so non-issue.
I just had to quote this from Thumper... why, if your not using your rear brake would you get an ABS equipped bike? The ABS applies the front when you apply the rear brakes. Not the other way around... or does it? If it is flipped around then you are using the rear... 
I just had to quote this from Thumper... why, if your not using your rear brake would you get an ABS equipped bike? The ABS applies the front when you apply the rear brakes. Not the other way around... or does it? If it is flipped around then you are using the rear...
I bought an ABS bike so I won't accidentally lock the front brake, whether by panic, compromised surface condition, or a combination thereof.
I think you're confusing the "Combined" aspect of Honda's "Combined ABS" with the ABS aspect. On this bike, activation of the rear brake will also activate "some" front brake--that is the "combined" aspect. But, activation of the front brake only activates the front brakes. Should you brake hard enough to activate the ABS, you get ABS whether you use the front lever only, the rear pedal only, or a combination of both. You don't need to brake hard enough to activate the anti-lock, in order to get "Combined braking", should you choose to use the rear pedal.
And, I teach advanced riding on a racetrack environment, and I'm usually riding a mountain road at a spirited pace. So I'm usually in a riding position where the balls of my feet are on the pegs, for body steering of the motorcycle.
It's not for everyone, and we're all free to choose how we're going to control our own motorcycle. I'm quite adept at using the front brake only, I can trail-brake deep into a turn that way, and so that's my choice and style, based on the way I ride.
Posts: 449
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
(08-06-2013, 11:00 AM)thumper_imp Wrote: (08-05-2013, 04:10 AM)dBuster_imp Wrote: Regarding the rear brakes, I think they do just fine. Have I locked them up? NO and I do not plan on locking them up. Like it was mentioned before, the rears are not for main stopping power on your bike.
hmm Lets see, rear brakes count for 30% of your braking power... The other 70% is supposed to come from the front...
If you are mainly using that rear brake for stopping... I removed my comment... *shaking my head though* 
(08-04-2013, 10:49 PM)thumper_imp Wrote: ABS--Never use the rear brake, so non-issue.
I just had to quote this from Thumper... why, if your not using your rear brake would you get an ABS equipped bike? The ABS applies the front when you apply the rear brakes. Not the other way around... or does it? If it is flipped around then you are using the rear... 
I just had to quote this from Thumper... why, if your not using your rear brake would you get an ABS equipped bike? The ABS applies the front when you apply the rear brakes. Not the other way around... or does it? If it is flipped around then you are using the rear...
I bought an ABS bike so I won't accidentally lock the front brake, whether by panic, compromised surface condition, or a combination thereof.
I think you're confusing the "Combined" aspect of Honda's "Combined ABS" with the ABS aspect. On this bike, activation of the rear brake will also activate "some" front brake--that is the "combined" aspect. But, activation of the front brake only activates the front brakes. Should you brake hard enough to activate the ABS, you get ABS whether you use the front lever only, the rear pedal only, or a combination of both. You don't need to brake hard enough to activate the anti-lock, in order to get "Combined braking", should you choose to use the rear pedal.
And, I teach advanced riding on a racetrack environment, and I'm usually riding a mountain road at a spirited pace. So I'm usually in a riding position where the balls of my feet are on the pegs, for body steering of the motorcycle.
It's not for everyone, and we're all free to choose how we're going to control our own motorcycle. I'm quite adept at using the front brake only, I can trail-brake deep into a turn that way, and so that's my choice and style, based on the way I ride.
I assume you ride with your hands on the bars/clip-ons. If that assumption is correct, attempting to steer with anything other than the bars/clip-ons is extremely inefficient, given the physics involved.
|