(07-21-2017, 10:12 AM)stormbytes_imp Wrote: (07-21-2017, 10:01 AM)Hondahawkrider_imp Wrote: Lazy Front end, is kinda like understeer in a car.. Basically if you got to make a turn the bike requires more input or force to get it to turn.
As mentioned, you can change the steering geometry by dropping the front. This actually means lifting the front fork in the triple tree, so the front end sits lower (rear is higher). So that the front end is more responsive or reactive to input. It takes less force to make the bike turn into a turn..
I find the cb1100 with stock bars and shock to be very neutral. Neither lazy or responsive. Some folks don't like it, I love it. It means if I am just putting along its not going to react to every little bump micro input from the rider. It's easy to ride under normal conditions. It takes a little extra to ride it hard, but it dead nuts in its reactions. To ride it hard it takes some extra concentration, but you know exactly how it will respond with a little experience.
All I want to do to mine is put the lower type II bars so it's a little easier to force ( for the bars, just need to put em on)
Wow that's so odd. The guy (a foreigner) complained about the bike being 'lazy' in the context of straightening out (coming out of a turn). Maybe he didn't quite get it. He admittedly was a new rider so.. go figure. I'm actually looking for exactly that -- a neutral bike. Something that's pretty much on autopilot, smooth and stable. Very encouraging to read this.
Wow that's so odd. The guy (a foreigner) complained about the bike being 'lazy' in the context of straightening out (coming out of a turn). Maybe he didn't quite get it. He admittedly was a new rider so.. go figure. I'm actually looking for exactly that -- a neutral bike. Something that's pretty much on autopilot, smooth and stable. Very encouraging to read this.
If you dive a cb into a turn going into the start of a switchback (quick alternating turns, left then right, or right then left), the cb isn't going to snap back to a neutral setting (ie straight up and down) that quickly. That said, with a little extra force, its fine. To me it's not bike that's lazy, it's the rider.. The cb in stock form has decent but not race taught springs in the forks, and its a dual shock rear, i.e. Not a mono shock.
So in stock form it's only going to do so much, but it's stable and a competent rider can make it go fast with additional input.
It's not a cbrgsxrzxrninja, but having owned several, they suck for basic riding, i.e. Commmuting, errand running, or just riding to a friends house. At the gap, or on the track, they effing rock..
However, if you need a real world motorcycle that's easy and fun to ride under any circumstances, can go fast if you know what you are doing (ie have or can learn skill) the cb is imho one of the best all round bikes you can own.. I won't argue it's slanted towards everyday or may basic riding, whereas a sportsbike is more race orientated.
However, that said, what kind of riding do most folks do.. I'd rather have the so called "gentleman's" ride over the racer replica. I will get more usuage and practicality. Plus, if I happen to out ride someone on a replica, either I'm the better rider, or the other guy is clueless.
I've been riding for over 25 years, own multiple bikes, and have wheeled and dealed at least one different bike a year for 15 years. The cb isn't the end all beat all bike, but it does a lot more that folks think.. I've put a staintune exhaust on mine as the only mech mod (PO replaced the fenders and side covers with black ones), I'm putting a t2 bar (lower) to make the transitions easier. Its probably the best all purpose bike I've owned (if you don't count needing to go off-road). At some point when the time is right it will get better fork spring and shocks, but only after the oem ones are done.
It's a Honda, it will run, it's got classic looks, you can switch it up to fit your needs a (thanks samurider.com), what's not to like/love