RE: "Am I being over cautious?"
Tough for anyone to say, but... probably? Back when this happened to my 2014 Standard, it didn't help me feel one iota better knowing that there weren't that many affected bikes. I remember wondering "ok, not a lot of bikes are affected 2-3 years after purchasing, but what about 10+ years later?" Would whatever was causing the high/low idle strike other owners' bikes later on? It seems to me that this has not been happening, that the issue begins let's say 10k miles are sooner, or within the first 1-3 years, but I'm going on memory here when I would read of others' stories of when the issue started for them.
Pete, are you aware of the different ECU part numbers for the 2013/2014 CB1100 models and the 2017ex? Some have surmised that this is because Honda knows of the possibility of pre-'17 ECU failure, and that the newer ECU had "the fix", whatever that might have been.
Have you checked the ECU part number (and availability) for the 2017 EX model? I'm pretty sure some '14 owners used the different '17 ECU with success. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
But that new part number for the '17 raises the question: instead of a '13/'14 model, could you be happy with a '17EX, or are you set on a the '14? As far as we know, there have been no '17ex models with high/low idle.
If the '17 is not of interest, and neither the '17 ECU nor other can be obtained and the issue would bug you if you bought the '14 you have in mind...maybe pass altogether and look at another air cooled, classic-style bike...like the Kawasaki W800! I've owned 2 of them; enjoyed them lots--so much I sold them for other bikes, but if anything happened to my '17ex, I'd replace with a W800.