Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ECU on its way to Guhl's!
Author Message
Rebel73_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 743
Threads: 79
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2015
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#31



Ok, so I got my ECU back on Monday. I threw it back in and took her for a spin on local streets. It does seem to pull a bit harder, but honestly it's kind of hard to tell by mere SOTP standards. Throttle response is very good. I'll do a freeway run this weekend for a better assessment.


06-09-2016, 05:04 AM
Find Reply
CIP57_imp Offline
Road Warrior


Posts: 1,229
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#32



(06-09-2016, 05:04 AM)Rebel73_imp Wrote: Ok, so I got my ECU back on Monday. I threw it back in and took her for a spin on local streets. It does seem to pull a bit harder, but honestly it's kind of hard to tell by mere SOTP standards. Throttle response is very good. I'll do a freeway run this weekend for a better assessment.

I didn't notice much difference with the flash except having the limiter gone and an extra 500RPM's on top as I mentioned in my original post. There is a noticeable difference going to a full exhaust and the ECU corrects perfectly without the need for any piggybacks.

Edit: I did have the map installed from from the PC5 power commander.


06-09-2016, 10:38 PM
Find Reply
Ulvetanna_imp Offline
Road Warrior


Posts: 1,527
Threads: 78
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2016
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#33



(06-09-2016, 10:38 PM)CIP57_imp Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 05:04 AM)Rebel73_imp Wrote: Ok, so I got my ECU back on Monday. I threw it back in and took her for a spin on local streets. It does seem to pull a bit harder, but honestly it's kind of hard to tell by mere SOTP standards. Throttle response is very good. I'll do a freeway run this weekend for a better assessment.

I didn't notice much difference with the flash except having the limiter gone and an extra 500RPM's on top as I mentioned in my original post. There is a noticeable difference going to a full exhaust and the ECU corrects perfectly without the need for any piggybacks.

Edit: I did have the map installed from from the PC5 power commander.

I didn't notice much difference with the flash except having the limiter gone and an extra 500RPM's on top as I mentioned in my original post. There is a noticeable difference going to a full exhaust and the ECU corrects perfectly without the need for any piggybacks.

Edit: I did have the map installed from from the PC5 power commander. Love to see a dyno chart. I had the impression the flash would really remove ignition retard from the lower gears. If bottom end is not really improved I won't do it. Had it done by Guhl's to another bike and the improvement was huge.

I like leaving the rev limiter where it is, not much up there anyway due to cam timing, but I would like the top speed restriction removed.


06-10-2016, 01:21 AM
Find Reply
dsinned_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 257
Threads: 22
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2016
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#34



No offense to anyone, removal of the speed limiter is certainly desirable, but kind of a big turn off at $375 for a reflash. The work to do this couldn't be any more than half an hour tops, including return shipping.

Not enough B4B for me!


06-10-2016, 01:50 AM
Find Reply
Rebel73_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 743
Threads: 79
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2015
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#35



(06-09-2016, 10:38 PM)CIP57_imp Wrote:
(06-09-2016, 05:04 AM)Rebel73_imp Wrote: Ok, so I got my ECU back on Monday. I threw it back in and took her for a spin on local streets. It does seem to pull a bit harder, but honestly it's kind of hard to tell by mere SOTP standards. Throttle response is very good. I'll do a freeway run this weekend for a better assessment.

I didn't notice much difference with the flash except having the limiter gone and an extra 500RPM's on top as I mentioned in my original post. There is a noticeable difference going to a full exhaust and the ECU corrects perfectly without the need for any piggybacks.

Edit: I did have the map installed from from the PC5 power commander.

I didn't notice much difference with the flash except having the limiter gone and an extra 500RPM's on top as I mentioned in my original post. There is a noticeable difference going to a full exhaust and the ECU corrects perfectly without the need for any piggybacks.

Edit: I did have the map installed from from the PC5 power commander.
Yah, I may end up going with full exhaust and PC5. Since I already have slip-ons, where can I get cat-less headers for the DLX?


06-10-2016, 02:00 AM
Find Reply
kmoney_imp Offline
Road Warrior


Posts: 813
Threads: 29
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2014
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#36



(06-03-2016, 03:59 PM)modmaster_imp Wrote: I hope you have better luck than I did with the reflash. I have a K&N filter, TSR air filter cover, gutted stock headers, Oxygen sensor remover, and the reflash. It seems to have picked up a bit of part throttle responsiveness because of the increased ignition advance maybe, but I have to have the engine above 5000 rpms before I can give it half throttle with out it feeling boggy or soft as I wind it up. If I give it full throttle at anything below 6000rpms it holds back or is boggy again big time. I think it was set too rich for my bike as setup now. It feels like I'm riding a 600 supersport bike with a bit more grunt at low end. Not as good as the way it was set up with the stock ECU settings. I'm not happy with it and I guess I'll have to send it back to try some leaner settings at midrange and WOT settings.

modmaster
When you say gutted stock header, do you mean basically open exhaust? I have an aftermarket exhaust, and if I remove the baffle (I. E., reduce back preassure) I basically lose all low-end torque from below 5-6k, the same as you describe. I remember it was so bad I basically took it out for one ride and then never put took it out again.


06-10-2016, 02:27 AM
Find Reply
LARIDER_imp Offline
Running Like a Top


Posts: 73
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#37



(06-09-2016, 05:04 AM)Rebel73_imp Wrote: Ok, so I got my ECU back on Monday. I threw it back in and took her for a spin on local streets. It does seem to pull a bit harder, but honestly it's kind of hard to tell by mere SOTP standards. Throttle response is very good. I'll do a freeway run this weekend for a better assessment.

How has the reflash been working out?

I'm deciding between the Power Commander vs sending out the ECU as my warranty is nearing expiration.


06-22-2016, 01:58 AM
Find Reply
modmaster_imp Offline
Running Like a Top


Posts: 58
Threads: 12
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2015
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#38



Kmoney. You are exactly right. That is what usually happens. This is the first 4 cylinder bike I have owned and I have owned plenty of motorcycles in the past.I'm 69 years old and have seen a lot of different kinds of engines. I think I expected to much from the reflash on this engine. After about 3 or 400 miles on the reflash I have come to notice that there is definitely more power but it has to be wound up to really notice it. I still think the mixture is not right at full throttle but it does pull very hard when I wind it to redline in the first 3 gears. I did have it up to 120mph twice. Once in 4th gear and once in 5th. Both times at that speed I rolled off the throttle a bit and it seemed to be picking up. Sure sign that engine is not happy with the mixture at that operating range. Like others have already said on this forum the reflash does help the part throttle pick up and overall I do see great roll on pull at 60 or 70mph so I see that it is better than stock but not as good as the reflash on my 2013 Triumph T100. That made a good 6 to 8 horsepower more and 5 to 6 more lb.ft. of torque and gave increases in at all throttle positions and great overall driveability. I'm still happy enough to leave it alone the way it's running. Modmaster


06-22-2016, 03:34 PM
Find Reply
daskraut_imp Offline
First Service Completed


Posts: 13
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#39



I bought a spare computer for mine (ebay) since my bike has an extended warranty, sent it out to reflash and just got it back. I will install Saturday.......but one question, where is it installed??


06-22-2016, 10:31 PM
Find Reply
Ulvetanna_imp Offline
Road Warrior


Posts: 1,527
Threads: 78
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2016
RE: ECU on its way to Guhl's!
#40



(06-10-2016, 01:50 AM)dsinned_imp Wrote: No offense to anyone, removal of the speed limiter is certainly desirable, but kind of a big turn off at $375 for a reflash. The work to do this couldn't be any more than half an hour tops, including return shipping.

Not enough B4B for me!
Sort of like dental work, doesn't take that long but the R&D is extensive.
(06-22-2016, 03:34 PM)modmaster_imp Wrote: Kmoney. You are exactly right. That is what usually happens. This is the first 4 cylinder bike I have owned and I have owned plenty of motorcycles in the past.I'm 69 years old and have seen a lot of different kinds of engines. I think I expected to much from the reflash on this engine. After about 3 or 400 miles on the reflash I have come to notice that there is definitely more power but it has to be wound up to really notice it. I still think the mixture is not right at full throttle but it does pull very hard when I wind it to redline in the first 3 gears. I did have it up to 120mph twice. Once in 4th gear and once in 5th. Both times at that speed I rolled off the throttle a bit and it seemed to be picking up. Sure sign that engine is not happy with the mixture at that operating range. Like others have already said on this forum the reflash does help the part throttle pick up and overall I do see great roll on pull at 60 or 70mph so I see that it is better than stock but not as good as the reflash on my 2013 Triumph T100. That made a good 6 to 8 horsepower more and 5 to 6 more lb.ft. of torque and gave increases in at all throttle positions and great overall driveability. I'm still happy enough to leave it alone the way it's running. Modmaster
Thanks for that, I will skip the reflash. Removal of the speed limiter would be nice but not that important. The CB1100 is just not that restricted stock.


06-22-2016, 10:48 PM
Find Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Don Guhl No Longer Tuning Motorcycle ECUs tj_gee_imp 45 2,958 03-08-2022, 02:48 AM
Last Post: mvk24_imp
  Guhl Tune/Derestriction Rox_imp 84 5,909 04-10-2021, 07:23 AM
Last Post: beardyweirdy@me.com_imp

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)