Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
(04-19-2019, 08:34 AM)peterbaron_imp Wrote: (04-19-2019, 08:23 AM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote: (04-19-2019, 07:43 AM)peterbaron_imp Wrote: (04-09-2019, 05:44 PM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote: Stable Mates neck-and-neck ...
GO, I just spotted now, excellent set up: bikes, colour and arrangement...NC looks like new
GO, I just spotted now, excellent set up: bikes, colour and arrangement...NC looks like new
Thanks PB. 
The NC was new in the photo, but is now a bit of a mud pie.
GO, I just spotted now, excellent set up: bikes, colour and arrangement...NC looks like new
Thanks PB. 
The NC was new in the photo, but is now a bit of a mud pie.
How many Kms on NC?
It's new - still breaking it in, so less than 1000.
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Range:
So far with the engine still new and tight, and the riding weather for the most part cold (between 3 and 15C), the following is the range based on mostly stretches of 85 to 130 km/h:
* Unleaded gasoline.
* 25% city, 75% highway.
* Average spirited riding.
* Tank range including reserve: 380 kms (based on 14L)
* If riding was more in line to 80 to 100 km/h, a 400 km range should be achievable.
I expect as the engine gets used and average temperatures rise, economy should improve.
Posts: 16,119
Threads: 342
Likes Received: 667 in 366 posts
Likes Given: 777
Joined: Apr 2025
I don't know why, because I'd never ride it that far without getting off for a break, but I wish the CB1100 had a range nearer 400 kms.
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
(04-25-2019, 07:05 PM)Cormanus_imp Wrote: I don't know why, because I'd never ride it that far without getting off for a break, but I wish the CB1100 had a range nearer 400 kms.
I suppose one could if they have the extra capacity tank (I don't), and drive at 80 km/h all day on flat Grade A road. Could be a fictional stretch, yes. Even if possible, would you? You'd fall asleep from boredom. Plus, a larger tank might give range, but not better economy. I would have to carry an extra Jerry can of maybe 4L, but that would turn the CB into a sort of mule bike.
I suppose the CB was marketed for simply pure enjoyment.
Posts: 6,966
Threads: 93
Likes Received: 417 in 234 posts
Likes Given: 829
Joined: Apr 2025
(04-25-2019, 09:34 PM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote: (04-25-2019, 07:05 PM)Cormanus_imp Wrote: I don't know why, because I'd never ride it that far without getting off for a break, but I wish the CB1100 had a range nearer 400 kms.
I suppose one could if they have the extra capacity tank (I don't), and drive at 80 km/h all day on flat Grade A road. Could be a fictional stretch, yes. Even if possible, would you? You'd fall asleep from boredom. Plus, a larger tank might give range, but not better economy. I would have to carry an extra Jerry can of maybe 4L, but that would turn the CB into a sort of mule bike.
I suppose the CB was marketed for simply pure enjoyment.
I suppose one could if they have the extra capacity tank (I don't), and drive at 80 km/h all day on flat Grade A road. Could be a fictional stretch, yes. Even if possible, would you? You'd fall asleep from boredom. Plus, a larger tank might give range, but not better economy. I would have to carry an extra Jerry can of maybe 4L, but that would turn the CB into a sort of mule bike.
I suppose the CB was marketed for simply pure enjoyment.
A 17 L tank is your salvation
Posts: 1,172
Threads: 90
Likes Received: 104 in 31 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2025
exactly and a 6speed...
bcos with the tank of the DLX / 2017 Model.....you get your 400km bcos it needs 4l per 100km....(minimum in my hands)
(03-30-2019, 12:01 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: Found out today my FJR will pull cleanly in 6th from 30 mph and uphill in 6th at 34 mph lol.
for something has a (big) engine torque......like the NC engine too.....use the force = torque or without force no move........power/rpm only if play the time a roll...rpms sucks only the tank empty for nothing.....
what lug ? nooo its force torque... ! .......self the NC engine turns round in 5tspeed with 50km/h- 30ml/h.....
and DCT by NC models accept by 60km/h already the 6speed....
hey peoples....
study one time the curves of a dynojet.(.performance test bench)..torque and power in relation to the gears (rpm) and speed (odo)
or
how much torque you have already if you stand only on place.. ..and 3/4 of max torque is in 99% of drivesituations already more as good
.
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Manual Mode:
Took the NC750XD for a spirited ride today focusing exclusively on the Manual shift mode. This is the mode I would use for a spirited ride with a lot of curves. If you just wish to casually cruise twisties, then Drive or one of the Sport modes will do.
Gear switching in Manual mode is incredibly smooth and instant. If the engine and load reasonably mesh, you feel nothing during the gear transition. If they are somewhat not matched, it is still incredibly smooth, but you will feel a subtle change in torque. Acceleration is much better in Manual mode than Drive mode and it is surprisingly fun. In Manual mode, twisties felt great and was as one would expect from any bike. I was satisfied. Even the frame, suspension and tires agreed with me. I also like the option that I can dynamically slip in and out of Manual mode anytime.
I did notice that fuel economy dropped in Manual mode. This kind of shows how well Honda is at stretching the range in Drive mode.
It is bliss to have options.
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
July Update:
Well, there isn't much more to say than what has already been said. Previous remarks are still relevant now as they were before. Let me try and provide a pointed assessment:
Pros:
[ul] [li]Decent fuel economy even with very spirited rides. Current average is 3.5L/100 kms (67.2 mpg U.S.) for a range of about 400 kms. Stay 80 km/h (50 mph) all day, and the figure drops to 2.8L/100 kms. For comparison, spirited rides on the CB experience 6.0L/100 kms.[/li] [li]Really fun handling for my body frame and weight. Even two up in the saddle is very easy.[/li] [li]Excellent in-town commuter. Really easy to maneuver the machine.[/li] [li]Excellent highway commuter. Good candidate for a mid-sized tourer.[/li] [li]I really like the Manual Mode gear selection. It works incredibly well.[/li] [li]The suspension has nothing on the CB, but unexpectedly it works very well for me.[/li] [li]I like the behaviour of the factory tires. We'll see how long they'll last. So far no early surprises.[/li] [li]Built-in storage and power outlet gets used all the time.
[/li][/ul]
Cons:
[ul] [li]The stock LED headlight sucks, sucks, sucks.[/li] [li]Pretty well all the automatic modes (Drive, and Sport Modes) are yucky. I can't trust them in curves. The most useful auto mode might be Sport Mode S2 when feeling lazy. It is also useful in urban traffic.[/li] [li]The front fender is totally useless in wet weather. The feet get drenched.[/li] [li]You want acceleration punch at 100 km/h? Use the CB. Otherwise, accept at least two seconds behind.
[/li][/ul]
End of the initial review.
Posts: 770
Threads: 16
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2019
Good summation. Thanks GO.
|