10-31-2013, 10:18 PM
(10-31-2013, 09:41 PM)sanoke_imp Wrote:(10-31-2013, 07:46 AM)Randy B_imp Wrote: I did my front at 9,000 but I'm still on my original rear. Bridgestones.
That's interesting. Was there a problem with the front tire? My experience on other bikes has been that I get much better mileage on the front than on the back.
That's interesting. Was there a problem with the front tire? My experience on other bikes has been that I get much better mileage on the front than on the back.
Same here, but it looks like my bike is doing something similar: the front is wearing as fast as the rear. That's never happened on any other bike I've owned before. The only reason I can think of is that Bridgestone made the compound soft enough on the front to make it wear evenly with the rear.