12-07-2015, 02:58 AM
ok..trying to learn here..old dog and all
If this is common practice and won't hurt the tranny..why was it such a big deal that Yamaha didn't have a seamless tranny in MotoGP year before last (allowing clutchless shifts) while Honda did? (and Suzuki is behind because they still don't)
It was claimed clutchless shifts with the seamless gearboxes were responsible for a gain of 2/10s or 3/10ths per lap.
If this is common practice and won't hurt the tranny..why was it such a big deal that Yamaha didn't have a seamless tranny in MotoGP year before last (allowing clutchless shifts) while Honda did? (and Suzuki is behind because they still don't)
It was claimed clutchless shifts with the seamless gearboxes were responsible for a gain of 2/10s or 3/10ths per lap.
