Posts: 896
Threads: 36
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2018
I found this link on another site and although you may not find your exact year and model it looks like most bikes are covered in one iteration or another. I'm not sure where they get their data so it may be somewhat subjective but still a fun to check out resource.
I find it interesting that the 2013 CB1100 is slightly faster than the 2017 CB1100EX.
https://www.zeroto60times.com/body-style...dion-14171
Posts: 5,024
Threads: 136
Likes Received: 135 in 57 posts
Likes Given: 65
Joined: May 2013
That's because the 2013 is red. I've been trying to explain this to Nemo for years!
Posts: 896
Threads: 36
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2018
The 14 isn't represented but that's probably because it was too fast to clock....
Posts: 12,677
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
(06-04-2021, 02:29 AM)KiowaEagle_imp Wrote: I found this link on another site and although you may not find your exact year and model it looks like most bikes are covered in one iteration or another. I'm not sure where they get their data so it may be somewhat subjective but still a fun to check out resource.
I find it interesting that the 2013 CB1100 is slightly faster than the 2017 CB1100EX.
https://www.zeroto60times.com/body-style...dion-14171
The test rider is subjective. That is, if the same rider, then maybe that day they had the runs and was not quite good on the gear management. Maybe the air that day was thicker, more humid than on other days. There are so many reasons for variation between runs. I look at each value with a +/- 100 to 300 ms error. Again, that is subjective in itself since I wasn't there to measure the error.
Huh. I noticed the measly ol' twin thumpin' 998 cc off/onroad CRF1000L had an equivalent 0-60 mph and 1/4 mile stats to the burly 1140 cc CB1100.
