04-26-2017, 12:57 PM
It all depends on taste of riders, say the RS does suite my taste, which i did not find any on older version. What gives me attraction and appeals in the 2017 RS are:
- The new tank, looks fresher
- Beefer front fork with radial calipers
- Fat rear tire giving a very firm look
- New assist slipper clutch reducing lever force and reduce hopping when quick downshifting
...
A worth consideration to move up from CB400 2015
- The new tank, looks fresher
- Beefer front fork with radial calipers
- Fat rear tire giving a very firm look
- New assist slipper clutch reducing lever force and reduce hopping when quick downshifting
...
A worth consideration to move up from CB400 2015
(04-25-2017, 07:14 AM)Wisedrum_imp Wrote: I shortly red an article about the new CB on a website in German called 'nippon classics'.
Most of the things written about the Honda could have been written years ago when the first CB came out in Germany. So it can be interesting for someone, who hasn't heard of the CB before, but to riders like me, who own a CB for several years now, such a review taste a bit like cold coffee with not really something new under the sun of Hondas aircooled Inline for. In my opinion, changing some parts of the CB, doesn't really makes a different and new motorbike out of it. It stays pretty much the same, RS this way or that way, never was attracted by sort of cafe racers, in this case a half hearted one.
All reviews may have its reason in the fact, that the new CB now is the last relict of a lost genre of formerly beloved motorbikes. The first one wasn't.
Wisedrum

![[Image: a020b19c73d9da866658dc62bc7afa3a.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/201704/a020b19c73d9da866658dc62bc7afa3a.jpg)
![[Image: 5a70166f41687e8494cd1e24a7a3153c.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/201704/5a70166f41687e8494cd1e24a7a3153c.jpg)
![[Image: c7be9d160dce4131adabccde197c0c2d.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/201704/c7be9d160dce4131adabccde197c0c2d.jpg)
