The CB1100 Community Forum

For me a one would do it might be the CTX700 might even go for the dual clutch version.

I am 67 and I have to consider what I can continue to ride comfortably. I am going to actively thin the herd this spring. Not sure at this point what I'll keep but the heavy stuff is all going to go.

Lots of fellows my age go to trikes and I've decided when I can't continue on two wheels I'll go to 4 not three (sports car). Not to say that a trike is wrong for others.

Bubbler..I watched that as my dad got older. In his youth he rode Indians, then Harleys. As he got older he got rid of the heavy Harleys and dropped down to a 350 Yamaha, a 350 Honda 4, then dropped down to a CB200, then a CB 175 and I believe his last and smallest bike was a Ducati 125 single. I think dad was in his mid 70s at that point. I always wondered if I would follow the same path. My older brother (he's 75) still rides a Sportster having dropped down from a Goldwing. At 64 in May I am still riding the heavy bikes, the ST 1300 and my " little" CB 1100, and my younger brother (62) has dropped down from Goldwings to a FZ 1000 and a Triumph Bonneville.

I too have no interest in riding a trike at this point, but could see myself riding a Yamaha 250-400 scooter.

The Vespa will probably be a keeper. It's just such a pretty machine and the only reason I would sell it would be if I got the CTX700 I probably wouldn't ride it. The Vespa is probably worth $5500 which would go along way towards buying the CTX700 and the 700 would be at least OK for a quick run on the interstate where the Vespa would not.

Not sure what I'll do. It's not just age. If I could drop some weight I'd be in much better shape to ride.

HOWEVER a fellow needs to know when it's time and I've aged over the last couple years. Age does not affect you in a straight line linear way. You take a step down then go awhile and then another step down. I am sure you fellows over 60 understand. Some times you take a BIG step and we all hope not to have that happen.

Anyone seeing anything on my list of cycles who has an interest let me know. I certainly can part with a couple of them with out suffering.

(03-24-2014, 03:08 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Bubbler..I watched that as my dad got older. In his youth he rode Indians, then Harleys. As he got older he got rid of the heavy Harleys and dropped down to a 350 Yamaha, a 350 Honda 4, then dropped down to a CB200, then a CB 175 and I believe his last and smallest bike was a Ducati 125 single. I think dad was in his mid 70s at that point. I always wondered if I would follow the same path. My older brother (he's 75) still rides a Sportster having dropped down from a Goldwing. At 64 in May I am still riding the heavy bikes, the ST 1300 and my " little" CB 1100, and my younger brother (62) has dropped down from Goldwings to a FZ 1000 and a Triumph Bonneville.

I too have no interest in riding a trike at this point, but could see myself riding a Yamaha 250-400 scooter.

heck ferret, I am only 56 and this lil bugger puts a smile on my face every time I fire it up



it's my work commuter bike
that's what I tell everyone anyway,,,,,,

I traded my Majesty 400 in on the new 14 DLX but we still have my wife's Majesty when I get the urge to go scooterin'

[url=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/theferret111/media/DSCF0027-5.jpg.html]

If I were mo longer traveling by bike and just riding locally this could be my one and only

All I know is my (traded in) Elite 110 was a hoot to ride. LOTS of fun! Kinda wish I'd kept it.

Now though I want ferret's ST1300. The CB needs company!

I think the Super Tenere makes a strong case for doing it all. Let's see, off-road, highway one or two-up, handles interstate duty like a sport tourer, agile in the twisties, easy handling in town running errands, carries cargo like a packmule. Stream crossings if you're so inclined. Shaft drive and 26k mile valve inspections. A reliable, more affordable GS. Yeah, I'm a fan. Only real drawback is it helps to be taller than 5'8" if you own one.

[url=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/cyrenus/media/14STen_zps9eaa4585.jpg.html]

[url=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/cyrenus/media/179301_zpseca4df5f.jpg.html]

[url=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/cyrenus/media/IMG_9583_zps0279affa.jpg.html]

(03-22-2014, 03:14 PM)Red Mist_imp Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-22-2014, 10:15 AM)Buffalohead_imp Wrote: [ -> ]I have heard nothing but good about the vfr 800.

I have heard bad. VTEC bad, comes on hard suddenly like a turbocharger mid-corner. New one is supposed to be better, and a little lighter. I had four of the earlier VF and VFRs and they were great. Once it became an 800 touring bike I crossed it off my list and never owned another Honda V4. It used to be a sport/racebike but morphed into a touring bike.

(03-22-2014, 03:51 AM)ride4now_imp Wrote: [ -> ]The KLR crowd might suggest that their bike might be the one. As an
owner, I'd have to disagree. The big single just can't cut it on the hwy.
I've never owned a BMW GS1200 Adventure, but I've read about them,
seen them in movies, and have a friend who owns one. I bet that
bike would be the 'one ' you'd want for the one bike garage.

Agree, have owned a few KLRs. Too anemic to really take on a long ride with any authority in traffic, not bad on a fire road, suspension sucks. F700GS, well, no comparison at all. The 1200 is heavy, very heavy.

(03-21-2014, 05:53 PM)DAC_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Do everything bikes exist. They're just not that exciting. The NT700 and NC700X are good examples. Very capable bikes that are flexible, just no "personality."

Problem with those bikes is they really have low-grade suspension and brakes. Not much in the way of motor either. They are commuter bikes or for entry or near-entry level riders.

One bike that can do it all MUST have excellent suspension and brakes and a good, flexible engine with a broad, usable power band.

Do it all bike, needs 80-120 HP at the rear wheel. Should be between 450-550 pounds, with high-quality, adjustable suspension for preload, compression, and rebound damping at both ends. Riding position should be reasonable. Fuel tank capacity range should be around 175-200 miles to fumes. Some adventure bikes fit the bill (F700/800GS), some naked bikes as well (CB1000, R Nine T, and FZ8 come to mind), some sport-tourers even (VFR800).

I have heard bad. VTEC bad, comes on hard suddenly like a turbocharger mid-corner. New one is supposed to be better, and a little lighter. I had four of the earlier VF and VFRs and they were great. Once it became an 800 touring bike I crossed it off my list and never owned another Honda V4. It used to be a sport/racebike but morphed into a touring bike.

(03-22-2014, 03:51 AM)ride4now_imp Wrote: [ -> ]The KLR crowd might suggest that their bike might be the one. As an
owner, I'd have to disagree. The big single just can't cut it on the hwy.
I've never owned a BMW GS1200 Adventure, but I've read about them,
seen them in movies, and have a friend who owns one. I bet that
bike would be the 'one ' you'd want for the one bike garage.

Agree, have owned a few KLRs. Too anemic to really take on a long ride with any authority in traffic, not bad on a fire road, suspension sucks. F700GS, well, no comparison at all. The 1200 is heavy, very heavy.

(03-21-2014, 05:53 PM)DAC_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Do everything bikes exist. They're just not that exciting. The NT700 and NC700X are good examples. Very capable bikes that are flexible, just no "personality."

Problem with those bikes is they really have low-grade suspension and brakes. Not much in the way of motor either. They are commuter bikes or for entry or near-entry level riders.

One bike that can do it all MUST have excellent suspension and brakes and a good, flexible engine with a broad, usable power band.

Do it all bike, needs 80-120 HP at the rear wheel. Should be between 450-550 pounds, with high-quality, adjustable suspension for preload, compression, and rebound damping at both ends. Riding position should be reasonable. Fuel tank capacity range should be around 175-200 miles to fumes. Some adventure bikes fit the bill (F700/800GS), some naked bikes as well (CB1000, R Nine T, and FZ8 come to mind), some sport-tourers even (VFR800). I agree with you about the VTEC engine, and I would never own one. The early VFR800s do not have VTEC. Also, the early 800s have gear-driven cams (the VTEC engines have chain-driven cams) which makes adjusting the valves so much easier - just unbolt the cam covers and lift the cams out.

(03-24-2014, 01:03 AM)mininsx_imp Wrote: [ -> ]If I had to downsize to only one it would be a Concours 14. Yes, it's a little on the heavy side, but it has shaft drive, it's fast, has plenty of power, great wind protection, handles like a big sportbike and there's plenty of storage.

Amazing bike by the way. Hmm. I forgot about the concourse


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(03-23-2014, 06:32 PM)Buffalorider_imp Wrote: [ -> ]A "One bike does it all"?
No. I had a Road Star 1600 and a Beemer K75 when the CB came along and I fell in lust. I sold the Beemer (two hours on Craig's List, at that point I HAD to buy) and traded the Roadie. I love the CB but I am already plotting and scheming on how to acquire another big twin Roadie.
Plus, I'd really like a Moto Guzzi V7 since I had a chance to ride one.
Really stresses me now that I have the garage space but the wife "just doesn't understand me..."

I like this guys style.
"Already plotting"
Now that's my kind of thought process. Heck. After hearing some comments hear I was after a 25th anniversary vfr. Love the look.
Some interesting suggestions on bikes have come up.
Sadly I'm weak and this input is likely to cause me money. And worse than that, the spousal pain that comes with.

Here we go again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, forgot to mention, responds well to modifications. Sorry couldn't resist.

[url=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/cyrenus/media/Bike3_zps094f80f0Tabasco_zps72a3b129.jpg.html]