|
RE: South England in June 2017
Thank you for the kudos.
Yes, it was a short trip but it was so interesting, the more i think about it the more fascinating aspects i find. One of them is of course Sammy Miller. He is a encouraging example how much a man can do by it will. He is a wonderful and friendly person, has an enormous knowledge about motorcycles, still restores them and kept himself, at his age of 84, so fit. He still rides his motorbikes and is so agil that there is no excuse for those of us who where on the trip, to mourn about something at an age of 55 or 60. [url=http://www.motorcyclemuseum.org/halloffame/detail.aspx?RacerID=394]Sammy Miller is one of the "[url=http://www.motorcyclemuseum.org/halloffame/detail.aspx?RacerID=394]heroes of motorcycles" in the American Motorcyclist Association [url=http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com]AMA.
People in England are very friendly, the landscape is fascinating, nearly every square feet (ok, except hastings/battle, but even there, there is an old monastery) of this land is full with history and prehistory (Stone age, bronze age, kelts, romans, normans....) . On top of that we were very lucky with the weather (except of the last day).
Yes, Hastings, Battle (Battle is the village where it is claimed that the battle between William and Harald took place) was irritating for us, but also fascinating.
First when we wandered on that museum route we discussed the sequences of the battle because we didn't expected something extraordinary. I asked about the artifacts of the battle when we did the tour around the battlefield (all the wooden figures symbolizing the area of the battle, it is, of course, a huge area because at least 14000 warriors were fighting and they had first come to that place, take a rest from the long march, arm theirself, find their positions, start the fight which lasted, according to the documents of the monastery, a whole day, etc.)
My british friends explained that the artifacts might be in the british museum although is was irritating that the Hastings/Battle museum had not one piece of it. When we arrived from the tour, after about 2 or 3 hours (as said, a big area) we went to the museum to ask some of the staff. And our british buddies indicated later that the woman which i spoke to seemed to already knew about the problem because she called the director of the museum immediately and asked in a specific way. They said, she asked him something "here is a gentleman who wants to know something about the missing artifacts", it sounded like they were already very familiar with the problem. And when the director explained me his point of view it seemed like he already though hundreds of times about it because it sounded more like a illogical excuse than a scientific explanation. It was good that we were 2 germans and 3 British subjects, my english is bad, but when my friends recognized the problem, they helped out with specific words which i didn´t remember so quickly. And when we had this discussion about a quarter/half of an hour, all the other staff in the museum, even 10, 20 meters away, stopped their activities, turned their faces to our small dispute and listened very interested. It was an unreal situation, it seemed not that one authority explained something to an ignorant german, it was rather that they were watching a verbal exchange of interesting arguments (which they already knew)
Beside of that, what marvicon posted was exactly the argumentation of the director of that museum. But that explanation is not lasting because of several arguments.
First of all, you always find at least some artifacts, no matter how much time pasted, no matter what changes made to a landscape. Beside of that, you had to remove 3 or 4 feet of the surface of the landscape right after the battle to make all artifacts disappear and that never took place, maybe when you build a very big complex of buildings, but that also only on that very place. And the area of the assumed battle zone is far bigger than the abbey. (but the strangest thing is that they celebrate every year reenactments where hundreds and thousands of disguised persons play the battle of hastings. One would never do that on a ground were archaeological artifacts were found or where an important battle took place which has such an historical importance to a nation. The ground would be destroyed and covered with thousands of new "artifacts". Could someone imagine that the authorities would allow such a circus were a real historical event took place, lets say in Stonehenge? No, that would be ridiculous)
As an example, in the year 9 AD the germans repelled the romans in the "Slaughter of [url=http://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/forschung/archaeologie/funde-und-befunde/]Varus" were they killed 20000 romans (its nearly about the same size of the assumed Battle of Hastings), wiped out 3 legions of roman soldiers, 2000 years ago and you still find a lot of pieces and artifacts on many places in northern Germany (and, still, the real place gf the Varus battle is debatable).
You can take nearly every battle in history, you will always find something. If you do not find anything, the best answer is that the claimed incidence never took place or it happened in an other place.
Even at very older places you still find artifacts, even if the whole landscape really changed like in "Neanderthal" were workers found 1865 remains of the neanderthal people which lived there 30-40000 years ago. The neanderthal place was removed but in the years 1997 and 2000 they searched again and even when the original hill was completely destroyed, they still found remains in the rubbish which were still there, but about 10 meter deeper...(!)
We have to know that the church and the medieval monkshood were the only ones at that times which were able to read and write. And they used this knowledge to gain wealthiness, land and power. In medieval, they most important task of a month was not only to pray to god and replicate expansive bibles but to falsify documents, certificates, records, etc. where they always claimed that old documents (which they counterfeited) proved that the land or wealthy they owned (or wanted) was their right and their property. This took place in nearly every monastery or church.
After the hints in this forum i searched youtube and there is a video were they are more scientific and realistic: in the video [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhAXPI3ueW0]Time Team S20 Special - 1066 The Lost Battlefield
The historian Dr. Laura Ashe tells from the book from the monastery that the only source for this battle is in that book and that is a claim of the monastery, not a historical evidence. And she said, the monks wanted their contemporaries to believe that the battle took place at that abbey so they simply falsified the history when they said that Harold was killed at the high altar (on one picture i am standing in that altar) of their church to gain land and resources. (this strongly reminds me at the german history, where the church claimed that there was a king named "Karl der Große" who made big gifts to the church, they counterfeited an endless number of documents and the only "proof" of that story is - the same as in hastings - one single monk who wrote it all down. But german historians, the church and politicians claims that "Karl der Große" was the historical political founder of germany, france and europe all depending on one single source: a monk who's task was to falsify documents to prove the "old rights" of the church at that days...).
Ok, i end with the knowledge of one big philosopher, William of Ockham who discovered a principle called "Ockham's razor": "Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected"
That is,
Theorie One:
1) There ist no archaeologic evidence of a battle
2) conclusion: there was no battle
Theorie Two:
1) An Abbey was build in a place called "battle"
2) 100 years after this Abbey was build a monk wrote down a a story that William fought a battle with 14000 man and said that, if he would win, he would build an Abbey on that place
3) The monk did this to prove that the Abbey had the property on the land and the right in that countryside (for lumber, fishing, cultivate the land. Monasteries were medieval commercial enterprises)
4) After the monk wrote the story about the battle, Harold and William, the historians believed that the battle took place at that point
(The other places like the roundabout also are not the places where a battle happened, they suffer from the same proof: there are as well no archaeologic findings or artifacts (except one single axe which is not a proof for a battle))
Consequently one can say, as many historians do, like i learned now: there was never a battle, at least not in Battle...
So, the weather today is finde, i will have a ride today and take a photo of the CB1100EX with the new fairing...
cheers
(and forgive me my bad english!)
|