Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rake adjustment
Author Message
Deanohh_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 530
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#11

"sliding the forks up wont change the trail"

another false statement. Trail decreases even under braking as the forks compress.


08-07-2013, 02:14 AM
Find Reply
Waffa_imp Offline
First Service Completed


Posts: 33
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#12

(08-06-2013, 05:44 PM)Deanohh_imp Wrote: You're saying decreasing rake angle (steering stem angle) increases trail. ......sure about that?

But perhaps you could show a scale diagram of what you're trying to accomplish. I've never seen a set of triple clamps where the yokes are set to angle the fork tubes more vertical than the stem, plus have a bigger offset to maintain the same trail. Is that what you're asking?

I don't get the purpose but I hope you find what you're looking for.

Sorry, I'm used to the coordinate system for the Patterson Control Model where the origin is located at the head tube intersection, and not the contact patch.

I want to decrease the rake as much as possible without the fender hitting the headers.


08-07-2013, 08:16 AM
Find Reply
Deanohh_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 530
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#13

(08-07-2013, 08:16 AM)Waffa_imp Wrote:
(08-06-2013, 05:44 PM)Deanohh_imp Wrote: You're saying decreasing rake angle (steering stem angle) increases trail. ......sure about that?

But perhaps you could show a scale diagram of what you're trying to accomplish. I've never seen a set of triple clamps where the yokes are set to angle the fork tubes more vertical than the stem, plus have a bigger offset to maintain the same trail. Is that what you're asking?

I don't get the purpose but I hope you find what you're looking for.

Sorry, I'm used to the coordinate system for the Patterson Control Model where the origin is located at the head tube intersection, and not the contact patch.

I want to decrease the rake as much as possible without the fender hitting the headers.

Sorry, I'm used to the coordinate system for the Patterson Control Model where the origin is located at the head tube intersection, and not the contact patch.

I want to decrease the rake as much as possible without the fender hitting the headers.
I guess by rake you mean the angle of the fork tubes and not the stem angle. Most would include cutting and rewelding the head tube. Or use a scale model that you could easily manipulate without destroying a nice motorcycle. Do you own a cb1100 that you will use for this purpose?

keep your coordinate system and your wheels on the ground and you might get there if the laws of physics let you.


08-07-2013, 10:05 AM
Find Reply
Jim21680_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 361
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#14

Wow, this got my brain gears grinding away pretty good. Nonetheless, short of having a triple tree custom-made, you're probably not going to find much...there's just no market for such a thing. Choppers, yes...but not many people are interested in going the other way. Lastly, even if you were to have a new tree milled out, I don't see how you could ever trust it. There's just too many forces that stem needs to cope with.


08-07-2013, 10:18 AM
Find Reply
Waffa_imp Offline
First Service Completed


Posts: 33
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#15

I am going the other way which is why it might be hard to find. And it is only a slight change, so I wont need to chop the frame. I just want to change the fork angle, not stem.

Can you help me understand how moving the forks up in the clamp, or compression of the shocks change the trail when the fork angle is parallel to the head tube angle?


08-07-2013, 01:54 PM
Find Reply
Jim21680_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 361
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#16

This seems to depend on whether or not the rear suspension is compressing or remaining static. (Is the frame rotating or not)


08-07-2013, 02:12 PM
Find Reply
Deanohh_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 530
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#17


Ahhh, Socratic dialog......brilliant.

Nevermind, it disappeared.

what are the other components that determine trail, and which one(s) of them changes when the front of the bike is now lower than the rear.


08-07-2013, 02:17 PM
Find Reply
Jim21680_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 361
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#18

Yes, after thinking about this...it's completely dependent on that variable; under real-world riding, the rear suspension will typically decompress under front braking, rotating the frame forward, and therefore decrease trail.

Now on a side note...2 big reasons you won't want to do this:
1. You void the warranty.
2. You'll likely invalidate your insurance policy. I'd bet my next paycheck they'd consider this a "frame modification", even though you didn't touch the frame.


08-07-2013, 02:42 PM
Find Reply
Waffa_imp Offline
First Service Completed


Posts: 33
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#19

I think Jim hit it right on the nose.

Trail is only affected by head tube angle and tire contact point. The only way trail would change from sliding the forks is from the change in center of gravity rotating the frame. I'm not sure how much this will change the trail, anyone tried it yet, notice any difference?


08-07-2013, 02:49 PM
Find Reply
Deanohh_imp Offline
Been There


Posts: 530
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
RE: Rake adjustment
#20

Given the dimensions involved, a capable frigonometry student could calculate exactly what the change in trail is.

This post is not directed at any particular person nor is it intended to offend any person or thing on the planet, living or dead.


08-07-2013, 03:06 PM
Find Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)