Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2019 Triumph Speed Twin
#1
Before I bought my new Z900, I was also considering the new Speed Twin, as well as the upcoming R1250R, which would likely be my first choice. Too expensive, however. For that matter, I really didn't relish the idea of taking on the cost of another spendy new Triumph.

Anyway, after my latest ordeal regarding my CB and Honda of America's attitude regarding my bike's issues, I rode away from the dealership fairly p.o.'d. Each time I came to a stop during my ride, and the brakes either squealed or the rotors made that cracking sound, I grew more angry. Eventually, after taking some twisties up to Grass Valley, I decided to cut the ride short and head back to town to visit my Triumph dealer. My purpose was twofold; one, to take pics of the rubber dampers Triumph placed behind the rotors of the 2017 T120, the thought being that I'd like to see if anyone here knows whether Honda has added those to the CB in other markets, or maybe someone here knows of a place that could fab some up for my bike; two, to take a test rider on the Speed Twin.

I'll deal with the Honda question in another thread. For this 'other bikes' forum, I'll simply give my thoughts on the new Speed Twin.

Okay, first off...wow. Wow, in so many ways. Wow, for diametrically opposed reasons.

You know how the Honda feels like a big ol' 1100, in every way? She has that big, stout, massively beating heart of a liter Four. She is long and rangy. When you get on the throttle, you feel Big Mechanical Things happening beneath you. Everything about this CB1100 feels like something Thor might ride into Ragnarok.

The 1200 Speed Twin? If someone blindfolded me and sat me on the bike, then let me ride it blindfolded (oh, shut up), I would guess that I was on either a Yamaha MT-07 or a Kawasaki Z650. Maybe a Street Twin. The thing feels that small, and not just physically. Sure, the ST is tiny, with one of the slimmest tanks I've ever encountered, complementing a riding position that is dead-nuts perfect for my small size. Think SV650, only skinnier. On top of that, the motor feels just as tiny. It feels like it has no grunt at all, and it revs into its very short redline (7,000 rpm? 7,500? Something like that...) every time I even breathe on the throttle. That thing revs so quickly, you'd never know it's a parallel twin, much less a 1200cc parallel twin. It feels absolutely nothing like the T120, which, while also having zero top end, at least feels like it gives a semi-decent little shove of grunt off the bottom.

This Speed Twin is not like that. It feels like a two-stroke go-kart. It's nearly as buzzy, too, as soon as you blitz into and through the midrange at the blink of an eye. The buzzing of that poor, overworked little (huge) mill is omnipresent, once you move beyond putzing-around speeds. It buzzes way worse than the CB, Z900, XSR900, or even the Street Triple. As soon as you think about accelerating reasonably hard, you're met with a wave of vibrations that permeate the entire bike, and before you know it you've ran into the redline.

It happens every time, and so effortlessly. You don't even have to try.

Yep, it's just like any 600-class Twin you've ever ridden, especially if you were trying to keep up with faster buddies on faster bikes. You use ALL the revs, ALL the time, and you feel like you need to apologize to the poor little dear afterward.

On the other hand, the chassis is PHENOMENAL. As much as the motor feels like a wheezy little 600 Twin, the chassis feels like the most well sorted, best-handling 600 you've ever thrown a leg over. It's mind-boggling, how well that bike handles. It turns even easier than the Z900, and that really is saying something.

Triumph applied some serious alchemy to this chassis. It's pure magic. Zero suspension adjustments available, too, and it just doesn't matter. At least for someone my size (5'8", 175 lbs) this chassis strikes the perfect balance of a supple ride, right-now steering response, rock-solid stability, sufficient firmness, and incredible user-friendliness.

The same can be said regarding those bar-end mirrors. I've never liked bar-end mirrors. They usually buzz like mad. These mirrors are every bit as clear as those on my CB, and they offer an even less obstructed rearward view. They're straight-up amazing.

The instruments are pretty cool, except for the fact that all I ever noticed was the tach needle plowing into redline, which was more than a little disconcerting. Also, the numbers/functions in the digital display windows are hard to discern at a quick glance, and I wasn't a fan of the way it takes forever for the ride-mode display to register your current selection, whenever you tried to switch modes.

On the plus side, the 'Sport' mode wasn't nearly as on-off twitchy as I'd read in some reports. It was fine. No worries. 'Road' mode is supposed to be way better for city riding, but I found it to be no different from 'Sport.' I never tried 'Rain,' and I doubt I ever would.

One of the things that drew me to the Speed Twin was the sound I heard in all the clips. Also, I used to love the sound of the T120, whether simply blipping the throttle or tooling along on the freeway. Loved that soothing P-Twin syncopated thrum.

Not so, with this one. In fact, I hated its tone, and I really hated its overall feel. It always felt thrashy and overstressed. It offers none of the T120's soothing cadence. Instead, you get a constant cacophony of two British cylinders trying like mad to do the job of three or four non-Italian slugs. Simply put, the Speed Twin always feels overworked, outgunned, and ready to grenade. My XSR or Z900 would rip its heart out, hold it up, and eat it right in front of the poor ST.

Which is crazy, because the specs indicate nothing of the sort. The ST's wet weight is the same as the Kawi's. The torque is even greater, and it's spread across a shorter, flatter range. The rwhp is down about twenty-five to my piped Yamaha or the stock Z900, so there's that, but here's the thing. The ST just doesn't feel like it has the guts, the gravitas, of a proper 1200 Twin. There is no way I should ever confuse those specs with those of a 50 rwhp Z650, or even a 70 rwhp MT-07 or SV650. On paper, and on the dyno, the ST has so much more torque than those little 650s. It ought to feel like a locomotive, even if it does run out of steam at the very top.

Nope. It just feels hollow and zippy; hollow, being the key. The chassis feels light and hollow, and so does the motor. There is no weighty, meaty core, letting you know you're astride a Real Man's Ride.

Now, sure, plenty of very light, fast bikes have a similar hollow feeling. Think of any supersport 600, or many racy superbikes. The difference is, they're also hellaciously fast, once you get the revs up. This ST is definitely not hellaciously fast, or even entertainingly fast. There are no revs to play with, and no monster grunt to shove you forward in that usual, satisfying way of so many V-based motors.

It's a go-kart, pure and simple. The most surprising, unexpected of go-karts, but a go-kart nonetheless...and, thank god, that description also describes the Speed Twin's wicked little chassis.

Would I still consider buying one?

Nope. I've crossed it off my list. As much as I love the way it handles, there is no way I'd spend well over $12K for that motor. These things are, after all, called motorcycles, and for a full third fewer dollars my equally light Z900 will rip the lungs out of the Speed Twin.

Man, though, what a chassis. Best-handling streetbike I've ever ridden, bar none.

You know what this ride really did for me? It seriously whetted my appetite for a ride on the new KTM 790 Duke. A truly tiny P-Twin, but with more power, similar torque, many more revs, a thoroughly modern, purpose-built chassis, and something like one hundred fewer pounds?

'The Scalpel,' indeed.
Reply
#2
Thank you for testing the bikes , this will safe US time and money .
Great write up !!!
Reply
#3
Critical and informative VLJ.
Reply
#4
I do so enjoy your reviews, VLJ. Thank you.
Reply
#5
Hmmm...interesting review, leads me back to my point on another thread that the engine is what determines what bike one should buy. I own a Thruxton R, and have tested the Speed Twin, and have 180 degree opposite feelings regarding this motor, especially vs the CB. I found the CB engine to be anodyne, with unbearable tingles in the mid range. The water-cooled 1200 HP in the Triumph? Intoxicating pull, similar to a V twin in the mid range, with the vibes being of the pleasant throbbing kind. I just rode mine 100 spirited miles last weekend on our rural loop, and smiled the whole way.

Now, I have a number of triples, including a Daytona 675R and MV 800, and they would likely decimate the Thrux/Speed Twin, but thats what 14k redlines will do. The Speed Twin is a roadster, comparable to a Monster, geared towards spirited backroad riding, and it is ace at that...if, and only if, you like the configuration, tuning and characteristics of a big parallel 270 degree motor. Which, as you'd guess, I do.
Reply
#6
Capo, see, that's what surprised me so much about the Speed Twin's motor. All my high hopes for it were based off of my love for the T120's motor. Everything you described regarding the 1200cc P-Twin's intoxicating pull and pleasant, throbbing vibes was present and accounted for with the T120. It has no revs, but it also never felt thrashy, and it revs so slowly that I wasn't always banging into the redline, whether I meant to or not.

I figured the ST's motor would sound and feel similar, but with way more grunt, more revs, and a lot more poke on top, particularly since the ST weighs about eighty lbs less than the T120. Instead, what I discovered was a motor that felt as if it had no flywheel. Whereas the T120 always gave me the sensation of having two big pistons forming a big ol' lump of Twin-style grunt off the bottom, with no power available anywhere else, the ST had none of that Twin goodness. Instead, it was just a very quick-revving motor that immediately ran out of revs, and rather than sounding and feeling smooth and mellifluous, it felt thrashy and overstressed.

It felt like a thrashier Street Triple motor, except that the fun ends right where the Street Triple's midrange begins.

I'm sure some of my perceptions of the bike were colored by having just spent two solid days riding the revvier, more powerful Z900, and the smoother, much slower-revving CB1100, but each time that I rode a T120 I was coming straight off of a Street Triple R or XSR900, so the difference in rev factors was even more pronounced, and still I felt and enjoyed the T120's basic Big Twin-style grunt and smoothness.

All the reviews I've read regarding the ST mention its lack of top end, which also applies to the Thruxton and Thruxton R, but they also describe this mountain of wonderfully streetable grunt. That's what I was expecting. Instead, I found that the thing revs so quickly and freely, I was zipping into the 7,000 rpm range without even trying, which would be fine, if there were four more thousand rpm to go, but there aren't. The party is already over before it even really started, and the accompanying soundtrack isn't smooth and soothing at all. It's full of sound and fury, signaling...a lot of annoying vibration!

All in all, not what I was expecting. This is also true of the handling, only in the opposite direction. Pure surprise, pure bliss.
Reply
#7
You just hit home, with a very large hammer, why you should test ride a bike. Several years ago I rest rode a T120 - not all that impressed. Then I rode a Guzzi V7 - it scored a lot higher in the grin factor but it really was too small for my long frame so it was written off (it would be nice to be able to afford a coffee bike, then the V7, or the Monkey, would be in the stable).
Reply
#8
It's funny, I've ridden my brothers 2016 T-120 quite a few miles and do not enjoy the engine throbbing at all. For me it is quite annoying. Always happy to get back on my CB1100 when we'd trade back. He however prefers the throb of the Triumph. However the CB and T-120 were very much equals in performance..we always found ourselves in the same gear and at the same rpm when out riding together.
Reply
#9
I think I'm gonna give one a shot in a couple years when I can score a used one. My only drawback (besides the radiator) is the forward slope of the bike lines. I've looked at one at the dealership and I believe I can raise the front of the tank to a more parallel with the ground position without too much fuss. However the seat slope and the air under the rear fender will prove more difficult an issue to address. I sure would like to get one in the mountains for a shakedown from what I gather with the weight and handling of the Speed.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
   Triumph Thruxton RS Final Edition misterprofessionality 95 4,216 04-09-2024, 12:21 AM
Last Post: Charlie Bravo_imp
  2024 Triumph Scrambler 400 X GoldOxide_imp 14 831 10-29-2023, 11:54 AM
Last Post: GoldOxide_imp
  Triumph SPEED 400 AND SCRAMBLER 400 X break ground Tev62 23 1,473 06-28-2023, 07:50 AM
Last Post: GoldOxide_imp
  africa twin 2020 alprider 28 1,246 05-09-2023, 10:15 PM
Last Post: GoldOxide_imp
  It's coming: A new Honda twin ... GoldOxide_imp 29 1,519 03-13-2023, 11:19 AM
Last Post: GoldOxide_imp
  Triumph Bobber at the BRP Country Store Houtman_imp 8 405 08-22-2021, 11:54 PM
Last Post: GoldOxide_imp
  Picked up another bike 2019 cb650r Honda_Fan_imp 12 541 07-12-2021, 07:36 AM
Last Post: PowerDubs_imp
  Triumph Scrambler 1200 XC on the way Henrik_imp 16 745 07-10-2021, 02:43 AM
Last Post: Charlie Bravo_imp
  Triumph Trident 660 Indypikes_imp 19 714 06-30-2021, 04:35 AM
Last Post: Stichill_imp
  Triumph Trident Gone in 60 9 459 05-08-2021, 05:32 PM
Last Post: Tev62

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)