12-23-2016, 06:40 PM
(12-23-2016, 10:18 AM)Ulvetanna_imp Wrote:OK, I have to admit that is funny. What's it in AU, I wonder?(12-23-2016, 09:56 AM)Cormanus_imp Wrote:OK, I have to admit that is funny. What's it in AU, I wonder?(12-23-2016, 09:34 AM)Ulvetanna_imp Wrote:OK, I have to admit that is funny. What's it in AU, I wonder?(12-23-2016, 09:05 AM)Rolls_imp Wrote: Wait, my dates were wrong. That not 3 new bikes in 3 months; it's 3 in *one* month! You've shattered the awesomeness meter!!OK, I have to admit that is funny. What's it in AU, I wonder?
Anyway, don't be a stranger. First, I've always enjoyed your posts. While occasionally incendiary, they're always insightful and informed by years of relevant experience. Second, as far as your new rides, I really like each of your choices, and I'd guess others do, too.
Please keep us posted on how things go as you enjoy your updated fleet. And don't let that age thing bug you. You may be 60, but remember, that's only about 48 Canadian.
Be well and enjoy!
(12-23-2016, 08:53 AM)Django_imp Wrote: I would have liked to own this Z650: http://nippon-classic.de/classic-bikes/k...staerkung/I couldn't afford anything in the seventies!
Couldn't afford it in the seventies.![]()
Mate, if I got the joke, I'd happily tell you.![]()
Mate, if I got the joke, I'd happily tell you. You mean you don't have a Hot Tub Time Machine that transmutes Canadian years to "Years AU?"
(12-23-2016, 08:53 AM)Django_imp Wrote: I would have liked to own this Z650: http://nippon-classic.de/classic-bikes/k...staerkung/[url=http://classic-motorbikes.net/kawasaki-z650-road-test/]Here's a really sweet article on that bike in English.
Couldn't afford it in the seventies.
The specs on that bike are really great. If Honda'd made an equivalent in an inline four package I'd still own it. Under 470 pounds, about 65 HP. I'd take a disc brake in the rear and maybe twin disks up front. Funny but those specs are very similar to the Triumph Street Cup and even closer to the new Z650. KHI is saying about 65 HP, but it comes in at 410 pounds wet with ABS. Come on Honda, in three years I'll be ready, I hope, to trade in something else. Make a 750 with these specs, air-cooled, retro-look, affordable (to keep it in production) and Triumph will have some real competition.
Kawasaki Z650 B1 Specifications
Engine – Air cooled 4 stroke DOHC inline four
Capacity – 652cc
Bore/stroke – 62mm x 54mm
Power – 64bhp @ 8500rpm
Torque – 41 ft-lbs @ 7000rpm
Carburetion – 4 x Mikuni VM24SS
Transmission – 5-speed wet clutch chain final drive
Frame – steel twin loop cradle
Suspension – 36mm telescopic forks. Twin shock rear
Brakes – 275 mm disc single piston floating caliper. 180 mm single leading shoe drum
Wheels – 3.25 x 19, 4.00 x 18
Weight – 211kgs
Top speed – 125mph
Wheelbase – 1420mm
Fuel capacity – 16.8ltrs
Mate, if I got the joke, I'd happily tell you. You mean you don't have a Hot Tub Time Machine that transmutes Canadian years to "Years AU?"
No chance. Even if we did, there'd be no water to put in it at the moment.
But I'll hazard a guess and say the answer is almost certainly 42.




Weight and weight distribution is definitely a huge consideration as I get older. I don't have any issues with my CB, not like the RT. The RT, at nearly the same weight, is a beast in comparison.