07-22-2022, 08:28 PM
(07-22-2022, 05:37 PM)j3gq_imp Wrote:(07-22-2022, 11:44 AM)PowerDubs_imp Wrote: Apples, oranges, and pineapples.
Please explain this comprehensive theory of yours ?
Please explain this comprehensive theory of yours ? Generally speaking, the phrase "apples to apples" means that you should compare things that have enough in common to compare.
"Apples to oranges" means that things are being compared that shouldn't be compared because the result of the comparison isn't meaningful. So, for example, comparing the 0 to 60 time of a BMW 1000RR to that of a BMW R50/2 isn't particularly useful because one is a vintage low horsepower bike and one is a modern superbike.
In any case, I've never noticed an issue with my 2017 EX headlamp. Is this something that is viewed as lacking?
(07-22-2022, 05:37 PM)j3gq_imp Wrote:(07-22-2022, 11:44 AM)PowerDubs_imp Wrote: Apples, oranges, and pineapples.
Please explain this comprehensive theory of yours ?
Please explain this comprehensive theory of yours ? Generally speaking, the phrase "apples to apples" means that you should compare things that have enough in common to compare.
"Apples to oranges" means that things are being compared that shouldn't be compared because the result of the comparison isn't meaningful. So, for example, comparing the 0 to 60 time of a BMW 1000RR to that of a BMW R50/2 isn't particularly useful because one is a vintage low horsepower bike and one is a modern superbike.
In any case, I've never noticed an issue with my 2017 EX headlamp. Is this something that is viewed as lacking?