10-01-2024, 06:15 AM
(10-01-2024, 05:59 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: Michael, do you have a tread depth gauge?
No, but just eyeballing it, the T-32 looked way deeper than the front BT54. I wonder if it even had 2/32 of an inch. It looked way shallow compared to the T-32. I sent it back, so I do not know its true depth, but I have seen enough tires to know it looked funny.
(10-01-2024, 04:06 AM)michael1954_imp Wrote:Another pix of the T-32 showed up, the front BT54 is the 4th pix.
Hi guys, these are the pixs of the BT54s I bought new. The picture that shows both in the box, shows how bad the front looks. I also have a pix of the new rear BT54 and the new T-32. What do you all think? I am glad I returned the front BT54, as it looked used and with very thin thread. The T-32 looks much deeper and should last much longer. The third pix is the front BT54.
This last pix is the new T-32.

![[Image: 488e957d00e640c76b11e0c490c19f57.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202410/488e957d00e640c76b11e0c490c19f57.jpg)
![[Image: 2b08a33a369505ce2600a766d848206e.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202410/2b08a33a369505ce2600a766d848206e.jpg)
![[Image: 491c2da5b46e12052e6d6dd6928cc4b1.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202410/491c2da5b46e12052e6d6dd6928cc4b1.jpg)
![[Image: da55850128c5ea83ca2b58c7d895ce32.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202410/da55850128c5ea83ca2b58c7d895ce32.jpg)
![[Image: 377dce8f35c603b156a542abcb95732b.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202410/377dce8f35c603b156a542abcb95732b.jpg)