Bonneville vs CB1100

[Firstfour_imp]

This is a common thread subject across many forums. As an owner of both bikes, simultaneously, I can answer with subjective perspective. The CB is a 'better' bike based on the spec sheet and measured performance. I love it. But a CB1000R is a 'better' bike than the CB1100 on both counts. And so on. There is always a 'better.' But I can't honestly say that, if forced to, I would keep the CB over the Bonnie. I just find the Triumph to be an almost perfect motorbike that is loaded with imperfections. There's that 'character' thing again.

Retro bikes are often bought based on a good dose of the rider's personal taste, self- image, nostalgia, and perceived character of the steed. Of course performance, componentry, and comfort weigh in, but a good number of retro/ standard riders overlook significant demerits in those criteria if they fall in lust with a certain bike.

Bottom line is, as always, if you love a particular bike, don't waste time or create angst by comparing it to something else or rationalizing your decision to buy a bike by pointing out it's perceived superiority to the bike you didn't buy. I'll guarantee you there are Bonnie owners on forums flaming the 'fat, chromed, characterless' CB1100 right now. Hey, let's go kick their asses!

Sign me up. Those "puddin' bowl helmeted, scarf-wearing, jeans-cuffed up, hipster-British wannabes need an ass whipping. Problem is, they'd probably like it. Hairdressers, every one.

Sign me up. Those "puddin' bowl helmeted, scarf-wearing, jeans-cuffed up, hipster-British wannabes need an ass whipping. Problem is, they'd probably like it. Hairdressers, every one.


I dunno, the bike in post#11 looks awfully bulbous, especially the tank - it looks like it was left in the sun with the vent plugged.

For sure, I'd take a Bonnie if you gave it to me, and probably enjoy it for what it is, but I'm very glad the CB came along just at the right moment, so I didn't end up buying one and regret it.