12-21-2016, 03:31 PM
OK I'm in late 20s and live in Canada so maybe things are different in the states, but here goes. 
I am yet to see people who hate Honda motorcycles. Not that I can remember.
In my opinion, Honda is far superior to Triumph.
Back in my teenage/high school days, I've seen Honda RC51 and Fireblade roaring on the street, I've seen Honda racing in Moto GP, World Superbikes, Isle of Man TT, just like anyone else did.
To me, Triumph is slow, old man's bike. Low tech, nothing special, blah blah blah...
I knew the manufacture named Triumph existed, just because I've seen them sitting at the dealership, but they were nowhere near attractive compare to RC51 or Fireblade.
Sure, I'm no longer a teenager, I've grown up and learned to appreciate Triumph's history and all the other vintage/classic looking bikes.
So I know that motorcycle isn't about Supersport and know that Triumph is well respected motorcycle manufacture, but to me, Triumph is just...nah. At least back in my younger days.
I am yet to see people who hate Honda motorcycles. Not that I can remember.
In my opinion, Honda is far superior to Triumph.
Back in my teenage/high school days, I've seen Honda RC51 and Fireblade roaring on the street, I've seen Honda racing in Moto GP, World Superbikes, Isle of Man TT, just like anyone else did.
To me, Triumph is slow, old man's bike. Low tech, nothing special, blah blah blah...
I knew the manufacture named Triumph existed, just because I've seen them sitting at the dealership, but they were nowhere near attractive compare to RC51 or Fireblade.
Sure, I'm no longer a teenager, I've grown up and learned to appreciate Triumph's history and all the other vintage/classic looking bikes.
So I know that motorcycle isn't about Supersport and know that Triumph is well respected motorcycle manufacture, but to me, Triumph is just...nah. At least back in my younger days.