(10-15-2014, 02:59 AM)AzBob_imp Wrote: (10-14-2014, 09:57 PM)CIP57_imp Wrote:
CIP, I am a bit surprised that taller gearing resulted in quicker acceleration as seems counter to what is done in the automotive world. Is because there is less shifting and more time with power to the ground?
A member here posted a 17 tooth front sprocket run, you will spin up the tach faster but it slows down forward motion.
http://cb1100forum.com/forum/showthread....ket+change
50-100 17 tooth 6.46 Shift point 42/68/90
Completely Stock 5.96 50/83
Yoshi Stock Gear 5.75 50/83
Gear change 19-38 5.61 60/95
This is a fair comparison since all runs are in the power-band and have two shift points. You can see how lower gears produce slower times.
Hope this is helpful.
[/quote]
A member here posted a 17 tooth front sprocket run, you will spin up the tach faster but it slows down forward motion.
http://cb1100forum.com/forum/showthread....ket+change
50-100 17 tooth 6.46 Shift point 42/68/90
Completely Stock 5.96 50/83
Yoshi Stock Gear 5.75 50/83
Gear change 19-38 5.61 60/95
This is a fair comparison since all runs are in the power-band and have two shift points. You can see how lower gears produce slower times.
The runs aren't comparable for a couple of reasons: 1. They weren't performed in the same weather (atmospheric density matters a ton, along with ambient air temperature) 2. They weren't performed on the same track/in the same area (inclination of the land and atmospheric density based on altitude) 3. They weren't performed by the same rider (variances in skill). 4. They weren't instrumented by a calibrated measuring device.
Higher gear ratios (lower numerically) make a vehicle accelerate SLOWER and lower gear ratios (higher numerically) make a vehicle accelerate FASTER. It's physics and there's no disputing it. I have raced cars for well over 20 years and this is the indisputable truth. You are mistaken in your assertion.
[/quote]
A member here posted a 17 tooth front sprocket run, you will spin up the tach faster but it slows down forward motion.
http://cb1100forum.com/forum/showthread....ket+change
50-100 17 tooth 6.46 Shift point 42/68/90
Completely Stock 5.96 50/83
Yoshi Stock Gear 5.75 50/83
Gear change 19-38 5.61 60/95
This is a fair comparison since all runs are in the power-band and have two shift points. You can see how lower gears produce slower times.
The runs aren't comparable for a couple of reasons: 1. They weren't performed in the same weather (atmospheric density matters a ton, along with ambient air temperature) 2. They weren't performed on the same track/in the same area (inclination of the land and atmospheric density based on altitude) 3. They weren't performed by the same rider (variances in skill). 4. They weren't instrumented by a calibrated measuring device.
Higher gear ratios (lower numerically) make a vehicle accelerate SLOWER and lower gear ratios (higher numerically) make a vehicle accelerate FASTER. It's physics and there's no disputing it. I have raced cars for well over 20 years and this is the indisputable truth. You are mistaken in your assertion.
Sorry Bob, but i disagree, put a set of low tractor gears in the CB and tell me what you run. The only thing you increase with lower gears is torque that's it, it may jump out of the hole, pull the wheels off the ground. There are equations used with different rears back in the day higher rears where not faster all the time, there is much more that goes into setting up for time.
BTW my runs where in the same area, temps may have varied a bit but all documented rather well.
Cheers