11-27-2020, 03:48 PM
(11-27-2020, 02:34 AM)bioman_imp Wrote:(11-26-2020, 01:26 AM)tod.branko_imp Wrote:(11-25-2020, 11:59 PM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote:(11-25-2020, 03:36 PM)tod.branko_imp Wrote: I was reading an article about this when I woke up earlier, and I doubt that these renders are correct for one reason only, and that is (correct me if I'm wrong) CB has only ever been a twin cyl in the 400ss, and I think I'd rather see a 650/4 or a 1000/4 in this kind of a sport touring set-up.
'14 CB1100 STD 5 speed
Maybe coupled with the "Baby AT" rumor, the CB1100X won't be an 1100. It could use the fabled 850 cc version of the mill.
Maybe coupled with the "Baby AT" rumor, the CB1100X won't be an 1100. It could use the fabled 850 cc version of the mill. Could be, but this sport touring setup reminds me of the CB4X concept from some time ago. I reckon it's the same bike only more of a production model, and that indeed was a 650/4
'14 CB1100 STD 5 speed
I want to like it, I really do. It is just that I like my women and motorcycles with smooth beautiful rounded shapes and no angles.
This bike is ONLY angle, except for wheels and exhaust. Sorry, I pass.
I test rode a 1050 Tiger when they came out, and yes, it was a wonderful bike. But even back 13 years ago, my foot kept getting snagged by the seat as I climbed over it. I had Triumph Sprints before, and would have bought one of them otherwise.

![[Image: cd7d5e8ce1b2a7fa28bd0a64cd60f394.jpg]](https://cb1100forum.net/forum/uploads/imp/202011/cd7d5e8ce1b2a7fa28bd0a64cd60f394.jpg)