Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2014
Despite having a glut of very nice full face helmets. I'm still drawn to an open face number for the summer.
I know this has been discussed before, but is just want to know, has anyone (or anyone they know of) crashed in an open face and come to any harm?
I see so many of the retro/Guzzi boys poncing about in them here and I'm getting slightly jealous.
When I was in Italy a few months ago they were ' de rigour ' and I dint see too many disfigured youngsters....
Am I being over cautious, or rightly wary?
Posts: 934
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 12 in 6 posts
Likes Given: 12
Joined: Apr 2025
I read some study - that I'm too lazy to look for now - that showed that something like 45% of crashes involve the front or lower front of the face area. So if you want 55% coverage, or you don't think your face is too much of an asset, then knock yourself out (pun intended.) Fashion isn't a good enough reason for me to take that much of a risk. And, FWIW, my face isn't much of an asset either. Or my ass isn't my strongest facet. Or something like that.
Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2014
(06-17-2014, 08:12 AM)DAC_imp Wrote: I read some study - that I'm too lazy to look for now - that showed that something like 45% of crashes involve the front or lower front of the face area. So if you want 55% coverage, or you don't think your face is too much of an asset, then knock yourself out (pun intended.) Fashion isn't a good enough reason for me to take that much of a risk. And, FWIW, my face isn't much of an asset either. Or my ass isn't my strongest facet. Or something like that. O.k, thanks for the info..
Posts: 23,472
Threads: 697
Likes Received: 582 in 260 posts
Likes Given: 767
Joined: Apr 2025
(06-17-2014, 08:05 AM)Tortuga_imp Wrote: Despite having a glut of very nice full face helmets. I'm still drawn to an open face number for the summer.
I know this has been discussed before, but is just want to know, has anyone (or anyone they know of) crashed in an open face and come to any harm?
I see so many of the retro/Guzzi boys poncing about in them here and I'm getting slightly jealous.
When I was in Italy a few months ago they were ' de rigour ' and I dint see too many disfigured youngsters....
Am I being over cautious, or rightly wary? 
I still wear one upon occasion. Today it was 90 degrees. I wore a 3/4 helmet, no jacket or gloves, jeans and boots for my 100 mile ride.
You never know when you are going to crash, that's true, but sometimes ya just take your chances. Im fully aware I am safer all geared up. I chose not to.
For what its worth I hit a car in the passenger door in 1968, went over the top and landed on head on the other side. I was wearing a Buco open face helmet, and high point safety glasses. I broke my nose and 7 teeth, and got some rash on my lips / gums.
Imo a open face helmet is safer than no helmet or a doo rag, so when wearing one I feel safer than 95% of the riders I pass.
edit..my open face does have a clear wrap around 5 snap face shield for rock/bug protection and also a small black bubble sun visor
Posts: 167
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
I'm suspicious of statistics, but this graphic is interesting.
The numbers represent someone's quantifying of helmet impacts. I don't know who counted and how they counted. Also, if something sticks out from your body far enough it's going to get hit 100% of the time, so those 19.4 out of 100 hits landing on a protruding right front quadrant might not necessarily have touched skin and bone. According to this there's almost no point at all in protecting the top of your head or the back of your neck. A helmet designed using just these statistics would look very different than what we're used to.
Moral hazard is a term from the insurance business but it applies to this too. It seems people with insurance are less careful to prevent loss than those without. Thinking that the most expensive full coverage helmet will protect one from whatever happens can lead to less careful riding than if one had no helmet at all.
If someone is convinced a helmet will protect them from anything, they should have no problem diving helmeted-head first off the front porch onto the sidewalk. I doubt anyone would do this and not because it would ruin the helmet.
Also, it seems other people around us can contribute to moral hazard too. Another way of saying this is that other people can consume the safety cushions a careful rider creates around him/herself. Seeing a rider in full protective gear and thinking they are impervious to harm could cause a harried soccer mom to be less concerned with the rider's well being.
I keep thinking about the "safety" post I'm going to write one day, maybe this will get the ball rolling again.
Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2014
(06-17-2014, 08:27 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: (06-17-2014, 08:05 AM)Tortuga_imp Wrote: Despite having a glut of very nice full face helmets. I'm still drawn to an open face number for the summer.
I know this has been discussed before, but is just want to know, has anyone (or anyone they know of) crashed in an open face and come to any harm?
I see so many of the retro/Guzzi boys poncing about in them here and I'm getting slightly jealous.
When I was in Italy a few months ago they were ' de rigour ' and I dint see too many disfigured youngsters....
Am I being over cautious, or rightly wary? 
I still wear one upon occasion. Today it was 90 degrees. I wore a 3/4 helmet, no jacket or gloves, jeans and boots for my 100 mile ride.
You never know when you are going to crash, that's true, but sometimes ya just take your chances. Im fully aware I am safer all geared up. I chose not to.
For what its worth I hit a car in the passenger door in 1968, went over the top and landed on head on the other side. I was wearing a Buco open face helmet, and high point safety glasses. I broke my nose and 7 teeth, and got some rash on my lips / gums.
Imo a open face helmet is safer than no helmet or a doo rag, so when wearing one I feel safer than 95% of the riders I pass.
edit..my open face does have a clear wrap around 5 snap face shield for rock/bug protection and also a small black bubble sun visor
I still wear one upon occasion. Today it was 90 degrees. I wore a 3/4 helmet, no jacket or gloves, jeans and boots for my 100 mile ride.
You never know when you are going to crash, that's true, but sometimes ya just take your chances. Im fully aware I am safer all geared up. I chose not to.
For what its worth I hit a car in the passenger door in 1968, went over the top and landed on head on the other side. I was wearing a Buco open face helmet, and high point safety glasses. I broke my nose and 7 teeth, and got some rash on my lips / gums.
Imo a open face helmet is safer than no helmet or a doo rag, so when wearing one I feel safer than 95% of the riders I pass.
The first part filled me with confidence, the second part with dread.
I guess it's like gambling, you can win or lose by taking your chances, I'm still sorely tempted. I've been cocooned behind full face lids all my life, and now that I'm not doing 150+ on a daily basis I think I could be ok with a 'piss pot' as we call them in England.
More replies appreciated.
(06-17-2014, 08:32 AM)Greg_imp Wrote: I'm suspicious of statistics, but this graphic is interesting.
The numbers represent someone's quantifying of helmet impacts. I don't know who counted and how they counted. Also, if something sticks out from your body far enough it's going to get hit 100% of the time, so those 19.4 out of 100 hits landing on a protruding right front quadrant might not necessarily have touched skin and bone. According to this there's almost no point at all in protecting the top of your head or the back of your neck. A helmet designed using just these statistics would look very different than what we're used to.
Moral hazard is a term from the insurance business but it applies to this too. It seems people with insurance are less careful to prevent loss than those without. Thinking that the most expensive full coverage helmet will protect one from whatever happens can lead to less careful riding than if one had no helmet at all.
If someone is convinced a helmet will protect them from anything, they should have no problem diving helmeted-head first off the front porch onto the sidewalk. I doubt anyone would do this and not because it would ruin the helmet.
Also, it seems other people around us can contribute to moral hazard too. Another way of saying this is that other people can consume the safety cushions a careful rider creates around him/herself. Seeing a rider in full protective gear and thinking they are impervious to harm could cause a harried soccer mom to be less concerned with the rider's well being.
I keep thinking about the "safety" post I'm going to write one day, maybe this will get the ball rolling again.
Great mini essay Greg, I'd be interested to read your 'Safety Post' for sure.
It appears I'm going at this the wrong way. What I really need is an 'open top' helmet, like a monk's haircut!
Now that 'would be retro' !!
The Arai Friar Tuck
Posts: 23,472
Threads: 697
Likes Received: 582 in 260 posts
Likes Given: 767
Joined: Apr 2025
Tortuga..truth is riding a motorcycle at all is a gamble with your life. You may protect your head, but a hard enough impact on your chest will tear off your aortic artery and you will bleed to death in seconds.
The absolute best protection is not a helmet, armored jacket, or armored gloves and boots...it 's experience, education and common sense with a keen sense of self preservation. Don't drink and ride, don't speed, don't take unnecessary chances.
Even when you do all of that, fate may have other plans.
Or I as I like to say, when the big guy calls, he never gets a busy signal.
Posts: 162
Threads: 19
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
Risk is a funny business, let's face it, riding a motorcycle is already a safety compromise. I never ride without a helmet but will occasionally wear a 3/4 with face shield on one if the cruisers but not on the CB1100. I wear fingerless deerskin in the summer and mesh jackets not leather. Each of these things is a compromise. We all make different ones, I know ATGATT guys who will gear up and ride somewhere to drink a few beers and then ride home. I NEVER drink and ride. Will I pay for my choices? Maybe, but I make them knowing it is possible.
Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2014
(06-17-2014, 08:44 AM)ThomWill_imp Wrote: Risk is a funny business, let's face it, riding a motorcycle is already a safety compromise. I never ride without a helmet but will occasionally wear a 3/4 with face shield on one if the cruisers but not on the CB1100. I wear fingerless deerskin in the summer and mesh jackets not leather. Each of these things is a compromise. We all make different ones, I know ATGATT guys who will gear up and ride somewhere to drink a few beers and then ride home. I NEVER drink and ride. Will I pay for my choices? Maybe, but I make them knowing it is possible.
May I ask why the cruisers are safe for open face, but not the Honda? Or is it just a 'style thang'?
Posts: 162
Threads: 19
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
It is not a safety thing, it is a wind thing. The shield on my open faced catches ALL the wind from the dart and it is like riding in a blow dryer.
|