When the mind wanders: twenty-seven to one!

[GoldOxide_imp]

Last time I checked we had a WIDE spectrum for bikes for sale in this country. Probably more than most countries when you also consider the niche makers like Motus, Confederate (or whatever their name was changed to) etc. Sure we lack the occasional model in a line-up, say like the CB1100RS but mostly the showrooms are chock FULL of various platform options designed for a whole host of riding styles for riders to spend their money on.

My take on this discussion about the USA's apparent fixation with cruiser style bikes:

The American buyer appears to CHOOSE one particular platform over others. I believe credit in part has to go to MoCo's advertising department because they tapped in to that American mindset of rugged individualism, go at it alone lone wolf, independent streak that was fostered in many other commercial non-motorcycle product lines. They took the Marlboro man, put him in a leather jacket and sat him on a bike, usually with the Stars and Stripes nearby and sold and capitalized on that image brilliantly. You only need to visualize the Terminator on a CB 750 vs the Fat Boy to see what I'm getting at. Their advertising department pushed the mantra of ….You buy a Harley and you get your man card punched, receive instant street cred and the local homecoming queen will be along shortly to ask for a ride. Now-a-days that sales pitch is called "Toxic Masculinity".

Secondary to that is a whole host of contributing factors that may make the cruiser the bike platform of choice in the USA. VERY Cheap gas so engine size isn't a consideration. Thousands of miles of wide open secondary roads and super highways stretching to the horizon. It's the ideal platform to ride 2 up on. Most are very accommodation to the vertically challenged etc. etc.

Personally I don't think its sad to see so many cruisers on the roads. To each his/her own. It was a FREELY made choice. What would make it sad for me is if the government collective MANDATED that we all rode cruisers.

Today I rode the UCMJ CB to work. Tomorrow it might be the HD RK Cruiser. Could be the MG V7R Cafe or XR1200. Depends on how I feel, but I’m pretty sure it won't be sad.

This has been said many times before in many different ways:

It is not about the HD machine. It is about the owner.

The machine is just a machine - that is it ... period.

On the other hand, the owner (and presumed rider) offers a way to perceive the machine. If the owner of the machine is not a dink, then the machine commands a sort of respect. If like many HD owners I have met who cannot carry a normal adult conversation, the machine is sour, contrived.

[VLJ_imp]

Nothing but Harleys here and the occasional Indian, not even any GS Beemers. What depresses me about the situation is the lack of variety. Being a motorcycle enthusiast I like looking at lots of different bikes. I would feel the same if I saw nothing but 600 sportbikes, or all CB 1100s for that matter. Imagine seeing nothing but CB 1100s week after week, 5, 10, 20 together in packs, year after year, and then a solo Harley rolls by. I would be excited as all get out, to see it.

I was glad inhouse bob' s buddy jim, rode a KTM to the rally. I never see KTMs on the road.it was cool seeing one.

And that was VLJ's point, wasn't it?

Monocultures are seldom good, so it's a pity not to see a greater variety of bikes. Around here you never know quite what you'll see. At the weekend, on the runs near the city, one will see all sorts of bikes from sports bike to cruisers. Further out, there's lots of Harleys, but also ADV bikes and the odd sports bike. We must be lucky.

Nothing but Harleys here and the occasional Indian, not even any GS Beemers. What depresses me about the situation is the lack of variety. Being a motorcycle enthusiast I like looking at lots of different bikes. I would feel the same if I saw nothing but 600 sportbikes, or all CB 1100s for that matter. Imagine seeing nothing but CB 1100s week after week, 5, 10, 20 together in packs, year after year, and then a solo Harley rolls by. I would be excited as all get out, to see it.

I was glad inhouse bob' s buddy jim, rode a KTM to the rally. I never see KTMs on the road.it was cool seeing one.

Was Jim's bike a KTM 1290? They're impressive beasts.

And that was VLJ's point, wasn't it?
Nope. His point was not that variety was desired, but that everyone should be riding a “Standard” bike and his secondary point was that he was embarrassed because so many folks choose to ride V-twins.

And that was VLJ's point, wasn't it?
Nope. His point was not that variety was desired, but that everyone should be riding a “Standard” bike and his secondary point was that he was embarrassed because so many folks choose to ride V-twins.
Wow. How on earth did you get that so totally wrong?

As Cormanus stated, my point was that we are now witnessing a conspicuous lack of variety. Making the situation even worse, the default choice is the bottom-of-the-barrel option, the McDonald's of motorcycling, the cruiser. I wasn't singling out the V-Twin motor design. Nope. Just feet-forward cruisers. I have no problem with V-Twin or L-Twin Ducatis, KTMs, Aprilias, Suzuki SV650s/1000s, V-Stroms, Honda Hawks/Superhawks, etc. My point was absolutely not that everyone should be riding a Standard-style bike. My point was that it depresses me that nearly everyone in this country chooses to ride cruisers, when there are so many better options.

[GoldOxide_imp]

If the conditions made sense, I would ride a lawnmower. That would be variety, eh?

[peterbaron]

If the conditions made sense, I would ride a lawnmower. That would be variety, eh?

GO, with motor or without ???

[Csory_imp]

If the conditions made sense, I would ride a lawnmower. That would be variety, eh?

As long as it has an inline-four...

[Houtman_imp]

My John Deere lawn tractor has a V Twin and forward controls , am I ok with this set-up ?

[the Ferret]

the mayor of a local community was just killed riding his lawnmower on the street

https://www.wlwt.com/article/maineville-...r/28972979

[Frulk_imp]

“My point was that it depresses me that nearly everyone in this country chooses to ride cruisers, when there are so many better options.”

Better options for what? That’s a totally subjective assessment and is based on a whole host of variables and in the final analysis is a personal choice made by the individual whose laying down the money. It looks like American riders have voted for a favorite riding platform and it appears to be the cruiser. In a democracy you get your say, not necessarily your way. 1st world problem. Get out and ride!

[Cormanus]

Last time I checked we had a WIDE spectrum for bikes for sale in this country. Probably more than most countries when you also consider the niche makers like Motus, Confederate (or whatever their name was changed to) etc. Sure we lack the occasional model in a line-up, say like the CB1100RS but mostly the showrooms are chock FULL of various platform options designed for a whole host of riding styles for riders to spend their money on.

My take on this discussion about the USA's apparent fixation with cruiser style bikes:

The American buyer appears to CHOOSE one particular platform over others. I believe credit in part has to go to MoCo's advertising department because they tapped in to that American mindset of rugged individualism, go at it alone lone wolf, independent streak that was fostered in many other commercial non-motorcycle product lines. They took the Marlboro man, put him in a leather jacket and sat him on a bike, usually with the Stars and Stripes nearby and sold and capitalized on that image brilliantly. You only need to visualize the Terminator on a CB 750 vs the Fat Boy to see what I'm getting at. Their advertising department pushed the mantra of ….You buy a Harley and you get your man card punched, receive instant street cred and the local homecoming queen will be along shortly to ask for a ride. Now-a-days that sales pitch is called "Toxic Masculinity".

Secondary to that is a whole host of contributing factors that may make the cruiser the bike platform of choice in the USA. VERY Cheap gas so engine size isn't a consideration. Thousands of miles of wide open secondary roads and super highways stretching to the horizon. It's the ideal platform to ride 2 up on. Most are very accommodation to the vertically challenged etc. etc.

Personally I don't think its sad to see so many cruisers on the roads. To each his/her own. It was a FREELY made choice. What would make it sad for me is if the government collective MANDATED that we all rode cruisers.

Today I rode the UCMJ CB to work. Tomorrow it might be the HD RK Cruiser. Could be the MG V7R Cafe or XR1200. Depends on how I feel, but I’m pretty sure it won't be sad.

Is it just me, or is there something wonderful about an appeal to rugged individualism and independence producing a largely homogenous response?

[VLJ_imp]

“My point was that it depresses me that nearly everyone in this country chooses to ride cruisers, when there are so many better options.”

Better options for what? That’s a totally subjective assessment and is based on a whole host of variables and in the final analysis is a personal choice made by the individual whose laying down the money. It looks like American riders have voted for a favorite riding platform and it appears to be the cruiser. In a democracy you get your say, not necessarily your way. 1st world problem. Get out and ride!

No, it really isn't subjective. It's quantifiable. Measurable.

Turning. Stopping. Accelerating. These are the three primary functions of a motorcycle. In all three areas of pure functionality, cruisers are stuck in the Stone Ages.

Everything else is vanity.

Now, there are two other functions that matter: fuel mileage, and comfort; comfort being highly subjective. Even in terms of comfort, however, feet-forward cruisers trail the pack. Check the chassis of any motorcycle designed primarily for long-distance riding. Check the Iron Butt Rally bikes. Check the chassis of any Highway Patrol vehicle, or any police vehicle that must be ridden all day, every day.

Never a feet-forward riding position, with the rider's weight centered on his tailbone.

This is not subjective. This is basic ergonomic design, basic physiology.

Quote:and is based on a whole host of variables and in the final analysis is a personal choice made by the individual whose laying down the money. It looks like American riders have voted for a favorite riding platform and it appears to be the cruiser.
Whether it's fast food, video games, auto-tuned vocals, NASCAR, professional wrestling, Monster Truck rallies, the Kardashians, gangsta rap, CVT automotive transmissions, Britney Spears, Donald Trump or Barack Obama, superhero movies, comic books, crap beer, pandemic obesity, embarrassing rates of illiteracy, the dumbing down of the basic English language, you name it, the American public has proven time and again that it flocks like sheep to the lowest common denominator.

Unfortunately, it's just what we do.

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people."

Absolutely.

In our neck of the woods here, i.e., motorcycling, the rampant popularity of cruisers over so many other, superior functional designs is just another three-ton stone added to our growing pyramid of cultural ignominy.

Quote:In a democracy you get your say, not necessarily your way. 1st world problem. Get out and ride!
I do. Just about every day.