The CB1100 Community Forum
Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - Printable Version

+- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Mechanical & Technical (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive (/showthread.php?tid=5071)



Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - chync_imp - 11-13-2018

Interesting video comparing engine break in methods.

https://youtu.be/xpoglovyy_8



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - Jim21680_imp - 11-13-2018

Wow!! What an injury! I'm glad he came back for one last episode


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - Cormanus - 11-13-2018

Poor bloke. Interesting topic and well reported, I thought.


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - flynrider - 11-13-2018

Interesting video. Can't say I was really surprised with the results. Engine technology and metallurgy have come a long way since the old days of detailed engine break-in procedures.

That said, I'll be breaking in my archaic, 4 cyl, air-cooled airplane engine next month with a very specific set of instructions for the first 25 flight hrs. (mostly running hard at max cruise power). The engine design is slightly older than I am. Big Grin Big Grin


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - Cormanus - 11-13-2018

I'll bet it will be good to be airborne again, Flyn. And thrashing it!


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - jtopiso_imp - 11-13-2018

(11-13-2018, 10:51 AM)chync_imp Wrote: Interesting video comparing engine break in methods.

https://youtu.be/xpoglovyy_8



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's good to get some facts backing what I thought: just being gentle during the first few (500?) miles will be enough. Just ride!

It would be interesting another comparison of warming-up methods: idle for a few minutes, then ride as hard as you want, versus riding right away just being gentle for the first few (10?) miles.

I use the second method. I think it's more efficient, more "eco-friendly", and takes less time and fuel. (I do a short commute with my bike every day, so... every little helps!)

For some reason, those in my area who like to let it idle for some minutes to warm-up, usually have exhausts that are way too loud Undecided


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - Wisedrum - 11-15-2018

(11-13-2018, 08:08 PM)jtopiso_imp Wrote:
(11-13-2018, 10:51 AM)chync_imp Wrote: Interesting video comparing engine break in methods.

https://youtu.be/xpoglovyy_8



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's good to get some facts backing what I thought: just being gentle during the first few (500?) miles will be enough. Just ride!

It would be interesting another comparison of warming-up methods: idle for a few minutes, then ride as hard as you want, versus riding right away just being gentle for the first few (10?) miles.

I use the second method. I think it's more efficient, more "eco-friendly", and takes less time and fuel. (I do a short commute with my bike every day, so... every little helps!)

For some reason, those in my area who like to let it idle for some minutes to warm-up, usually have exhausts that are way too loud Undecided

The second way is the one I warm up the engines of my motorbikes too for the same reasons. Don't like to let them idle for a minute or longer after the start and then start the ride.

Wisedrum


RE: Engine break in test - recommended vs aggressive - dave - 11-23-2018

Thanks chync, interesting video.