![]() |
|
Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? (/showthread.php?tid=2333) |
Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - Shinchan_imp - 07-12-2016 I was just flipping through the registry and noticed that all of the bikes #10 and under seemed to be ABS bikes. My bike is number 11 and is non-ABS. I was wondering if anyone had an under-10 bike that was not ABS? Possible that the first 10 were all ABS for some reason? RE: Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - Randy B - 07-12-2016 ABS and non ABS bikes have a different VIN. If you go through the registry you will notice some duplicates with the last 6 numbers due to that. RE: Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - Shinchan_imp - 07-12-2016 Makes sense, thanks! (07-12-2016, 03:16 AM)Randy B_imp Wrote: ABS and non ABS bikes have a different VIN. If you go through the registry you will notice some duplicates with the last 6 numbers due to that. RE: Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - Cormanus - 07-12-2016 There is #7 in non-ABS. I also find it curious that there's nothing between #480 and #1069 in the ABS bikes. Indeed I wonder if #1069 really does have ABS. RE: Were the first 10 2013 bikes ABS? - the Ferret - 07-12-2016 probably another one of those "rear only" ABS bikes lol |