+- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Mechanical & Technical (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Octane Rating (/showthread.php?tid=5808)
RE: Octane Rating - Pauley - 01-01-2015
Make sense. Thanks, Mininsx.
RE: Octane Rating - Offroad - 06-08-2015
I feel like Winston Churchill:
"I always like to learn, but I don't always like to be taught."
I didn't know about all the problems with ethanol.
I always wondered why it was a good idea to convert food into fuel when so many people go hungry, but I just figured, like Gossman, the good of being renewable, helping farmers, cleaner air must be the reasons.
Thanks for the education, I'll do more research but in the mean time, I'll watch what gas I put into my fuel tanks.
RE: Octane Rating - Motogeezer1949_imp - 06-08-2015
While in Robbinsville I tried a tank full of 92 octane non-eth.
Motor felt like it was running razor sharp
RE: Octane Rating - Mike Bee_imp - 06-09-2015
(12-26-2014, 04:17 AM)redbirds_imp Wrote:(12-26-2014, 03:43 AM)Django_imp Wrote: Hm, I wonder why you have this low quality fuel in the US?
Here in Europe, cheapest fuel starts at 95 Octan. There are 2 sorts, one containing 5% or less Ethanol, one containing 10% Ethanol, called E10.
Then there is at least one sort of 98 Octan, some brands offer even more than 100 Octan.
The CB has relatively low compression, 9.something. So it needs not that quality of fuel. However, my BMW K1100 had compression 14 to 1, still ok with 95 Octan, but should not have less.
Most sportcars like Porsche here need 98 octan, to allow full power. They can handle less qualitity, will have less power then.
My understanding is that a different standard is used for Euro and US octane ratings. I think the Low number octane rating is about the same octane in both places. The real shame is that Ethanol fuel, which has less energy per gallon, is forced on the American public by politicians that either through ignorance or agri-business payoffs mandate it's use. Lucky for me that I have several local dealers that sell the mid grade non Ethanol fuel.
My understanding is that a different standard is used for Euro and US octane ratings. I think the Low number octane rating is about the same octane in both places. The real shame is that Ethanol fuel, which has less energy per gallon, is forced on the American public by politicians that either through ignorance or agri-business payoffs mandate it's use. Lucky for me that I have several local dealers that sell the mid grade non Ethanol fuel.
I would simply add that ethanol production creates a larger carbon footprint, reduces the food supply, increases the price of fuel, and reduces gas mileage - a lose-lose situation.
~ The Bee
RE: Octane Rating - Offroad - 06-09-2015
I have a science back ground, but just trying to learn here.....I had to look this one up: ethanol production creates a larger carbon footprint
At first couldn't figure out how ethanol would produce more CO2 since it burns cleaner than oil, but from what I'm finding, they are saying the converting of land from forest to corn production is where the lost of CO2 conversion by those forest creates an increase in over all CO2....is that correct?
More efficient ethanol: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/flexible_fuel_emissions.html
Loss of forrest: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yi_Yang20/publication/269110891_Marginal_yield_technological_advances_and_emissions_timing_in_corn_ethanol's_carbon_payback_time/links/5481c85c0cf2792435d88a3c.pdf
It's like the climate change / global warming debate...so much conflicting confusing data it's almost overwhelming.
RE: Octane Rating - Motogeezer1949_imp - 06-09-2015
The way octane is rated is different usa vs. europe.
Octane Rating - Cormanus - 06-09-2015
It's a discussion about which we should tread carefully given the rules of this forum. Politics plays a not inconsiderable role in this equation.
RE: Octane Rating - Novice_imp - 06-09-2015
(06-09-2015, 07:01 AM)Cormanus_imp Wrote: It's a discussion about which we should tread carefully given the rules of this forum. Politics plays a not inconsiderable role in this equation.
I agree. The compression in our CBs (I think it's 9.5) is one of the great things about it and a selling point for me simply because I don't have to worry about using high octane gas. In fact, from what I've read on this forum, it's better to stick to the cheap stuff. Combined with the steel fuel tank I think we are in the best position possible give that finding ethanol free gas is not so easy (at least not around here).
RE: Octane Rating - xNE0x_imp - 06-09-2015
Yes, the CB1100 is 9.5:1 allowing pump gas (87 octane) to be run. Running premium will net you no gains whatsoever, other than a false belief that it did.
RE: Octane Rating - widude - 06-09-2015
I'm not feeling the need for high octane, but I do use non-ethanol fuel in about all of my small engines, including the CB1100.
That non-ethanol fuel happens to be 91 octane in my area. It's more of a storage/longevity issue, especially with older engines. I feel the rubber/plastic in some of the older engines doesn't like ethanol fuel sitting for extended periods.