![]() |
|
1982 CBX - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Other Stuff (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Other Bikes (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: 1982 CBX (/showthread.php?tid=6314) |
RE: 1982 CBX - Nachodaddy - 04-22-2024 We used to call those dull-looking cars with hidden monster engines, "sleepers.": I don't know if they are still called sleepers, but they sure are fun. A Dart convertible would be fun. With or without the Jensens. RE: 1982 CBX - Gone in 60 - 04-22-2024 (04-22-2024, 07:28 AM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote:(04-22-2024, 07:18 AM)Gone in 60_imp Wrote: Thank you very much for your confidence in my persuasion abilities, Cormanus, but there are bigger fish frying in the pan right now... It underwent a mid-80s cost-no-object restoration, so naturally yes, it has Jensen 6x9s. My friend is trying to get me interested in his '71 Newport. But, I don't think I have the mutton chops for it, and other than the B52s song, I don't have an existential connection to it. And being as big as a whale, no doubt it would push everything, including all three of my bikes, out of the garage. RE: 1982 CBX - GoldOxide_imp - 04-22-2024 (04-22-2024, 09:54 AM)Gone in 60_imp Wrote:(04-22-2024, 07:28 AM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote:(04-22-2024, 07:18 AM)Gone in 60_imp Wrote: Thank you very much for your confidence in my persuasion abilities, Cormanus, but there are bigger fish frying in the pan right now... Ja. Get the two door. RE: 1982 CBX - Cormanus - 04-22-2024 Gone, to say I’m disappointed is a serious understatement. A car over the chance magically to convert a CT90 to a CBX? Should your mate let you down, you could make a play for both the CT90 and the CBX on the basis that the fuel bill for the car would, in less than 12 months, be more than the capital and running costs of both bikes. RE: 1982 CBX - GoldOxide_imp - 04-22-2024 Cormanus is thinking big, Gone. RE: 1982 CBX - Gone in 60 - 04-23-2024 Cormanus, while I value your belief that I can perform miracles, I thought it was pretty clear that the "CT90 into a CBX" plane has already crashed into the mountain. Besides, since the phones are always monitoring what we do, of course my YouTube feed is now awash with CBX videos. I watched Leno's this morning, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMWurGORq_8 He talks about how his '81 CBX was his first vehicle purchased new. He also talks about how complex the bike is, and how you have to drop the engine to check the valves. I can't be bothered to lift the tank on my CB to check the valves. Do you think I'm going to drop a six-cylinder engine? RE: 1982 CBX - GoldOxide_imp - 04-23-2024 ... from destruction is born resurrection (like Phoenix?). Just imagine: That wind-up through the L.A. core avenues, Gone. RE: 1982 CBX - Gone in 60 - 04-23-2024 (04-23-2024, 02:39 AM)GoldOxide_imp Wrote: ... from destruction is born resurrection (like Phoenix?). Yes, yes, I get it. The sound of a CBX inline six richocheting off of a row of office buildings on both sides of me would be more intoxicating than the sound of a Dodge Slant Six, I have preliminary spousal approval on the latter. RE: 1982 CBX - GoldOxide_imp - 04-23-2024 Slant Six. There is sumthin' common between these two themes. RE: 1982 CBX - Gone in 60 - 04-23-2024 Yes there is. Mopar did it so they could lower hood height on the Valiant. Honda did it so the gas tank on the CBX wouldn't be in your chest. |