![]() |
|
Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: Mechanical & Technical (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? (/showthread.php?tid=4648) |
RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - bflint - 02-01-2021 (02-01-2021, 05:07 AM)max_imp Wrote: Mr flint and others have a look at this guy's clip, my advice; spend the time to block any openings with pieces of cloth stuck into them before removing any buckets.Thanks Mr Max. I have worried a bit about that. Will check what prevention steps I can implement prior to replacing the shims. Good news is that I have a "stubby air nozzle" that I can do compressed air voodoo magic with
RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - dave - 02-01-2021 Am I the only one who doesn't understand these numbers? The specs are: Intake = .006 +/- .001 inch = .007 / .005. Exhaust = .011 +/- .001 inch = .012 / .010. The final, calculated clearances are .065 and .051? Do we mean .0065 / .0051? RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - peterbaron - 02-01-2021 OMG
RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - Cormanus - 02-01-2021 Dave, to be clear, I know nothing about this subject, but ... I think the values .065 and .051 are shim sizes rather than clearances. Would that make sense? RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - jimgl3_imp - 02-01-2021 I'm with Django. Nicely put Django. RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - bflint - 02-02-2021 (02-01-2021, 10:51 AM)Dave_imp Wrote: Am I the only one who doesn't understand these numbers? The specs are:Yes they are supposed to represent valve clearances. Typo error on my part. Sorry for confusion! I have been working wee into the morning hours on IT problems at work. What I meant is 0.0065 and 0.0051. FYI, got this figures from the spreadsheets I posted. RE: Valve Shimming - which side of spec? - dave - 02-02-2021 Yes they are supposed to represent valve clearances. Typo error on my part. Sorry for confusion! I have been working wee into the morning hours on IT problems at work. What I meant is 0.0065 and 0.0051. FYI, got this figures from the spreadsheets I posted. [/quote] Thank you very much for that clarification Bflint! I don't mean to be anal, but it comes with being an aerospace engineer. I have made errors much smaller than this in reports I have published and you would have thought the entire world stopped turning. |