![]() |
|
2013 vs. 2014 - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: 2013 vs. 2014 (/showthread.php?tid=3309) |
RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - Pterodactyl_imp - 09-18-2014 (09-18-2014, 12:03 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:Only the the knee pads, on the tank. All of the rest is how Honda originally presented the concept, at the motorcycle show. I fell in love at that very moment. As with most show vehicles, a lot if it (as you are noticing) didn't translate into production. But, the fact that we have to look twice, or three times, reflects how well they actually did. Those pipes were far more CB400, and I wish they had made it.(09-17-2014, 02:41 PM)Pterodactyl_imp Wrote:Only the the knee pads, on the tank. All of the rest is how Honda originally presented the concept, at the motorcycle show. I fell in love at that very moment. As with most show vehicles, a lot if it (as you are noticing) didn't translate into production. But, the fact that we have to look twice, or three times, reflects how well they actually did. Those pipes were far more CB400, and I wish they had made it.(09-17-2014, 10:22 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:Exactly. Just looks right to me. Scanning through all the threads here, over the past few weeks, I have noted several individuals attempting the modification, but none yet have looked right to me.(09-17-2014, 10:12 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: Tank knee padsExactly. Just looks right to me. Scanning through all the threads here, over the past few weeks, I have noted several individuals attempting the modification, but none yet have looked right to me. Here are the original http://www.cb1100forum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=338 photos, including a 3/4 view. Interesting. Maybe Honda realised the market for retro standard was difficult at a price above that of the W650/800 and the Bonnie and consequently built the CB down from the concept. In Oz the RRP for the '10 model was AUD15000 plus on road costs. To give you an idea, that was when AUD and USD were on parity. The CB did not sell as well as the Kwaka or the Trumpy. In fact it bombed and was withdrawn from the Oz market while the other two still trickle out of the dealerships. Cheers. RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - Papa Weeley_imp - 09-18-2014 (09-17-2014, 09:43 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 08:18 AM)ClassicVW_imp Wrote: I could have bought either a '13 or a '14. I chose the '13 because I really like the overall look better, the wheels, the 1/2 black engine. The smaller side covers. The only concern I had was would I be riding and looking for a 6th gear like I do with my Honda NT? Well, the NT is a two cylinder, so the revs are higher. I do not look for a 6th at all on my CB. The revs are fine where I cruise at, and I have no vibrations at all. Even if I had bought a '13 without seeing a '14 and I later lusted after a '14, no way would I part with an extra $5500 just to get one. I work too hard for my money. Just me. YMMV.Exactly the same here. Both models available at the dealer. To me, the 13 is just looks slightly better. I may be odd man out, but I love the silver side covers with the red tank. Maybe because that was the way the original prototype looked, several years back. I still have the downloaded image on my computer today. In fact, I edited it to add the one thing I thought was missing from the design. Can y'all spot my Photoshop (actually Xara) add on? That sir, is frackin' gorgeous! Very sporty. I like that a lot. RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - rboe - 09-18-2014 I call the 2013 model; the Classic. Then you have that new fangled high falootin' 2014. Which is fine if you like all that new stuff....... (I'm trying to convince myself the 2013 is just fine). Laam seat is on the way back to me, hope to test it out this weekend. RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - Pterodactyl_imp - 09-18-2014 (09-18-2014, 07:01 AM)Papa Weeley_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 09:43 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 08:18 AM)ClassicVW_imp Wrote: I could have bought either a '13 or a '14. I chose the '13 because I really like the overall look better, the wheels, the 1/2 black engine. The smaller side covers. The only concern I had was would I be riding and looking for a 6th gear like I do with my Honda NT? Well, the NT is a two cylinder, so the revs are higher. I do not look for a 6th at all on my CB. The revs are fine where I cruise at, and I have no vibrations at all. Even if I had bought a '13 without seeing a '14 and I later lusted after a '14, no way would I part with an extra $5500 just to get one. I work too hard for my money. Just me. YMMV.Exactly the same here. Both models available at the dealer. To me, the 13 is just looks slightly better. I may be odd man out, but I love the silver side covers with the red tank. Maybe because that was the way the original prototype looked, several years back. I still have the downloaded image on my computer today. In fact, I edited it to add the one thing I thought was missing from the design. Can y'all spot my Photoshop (actually Xara) add on? That sir, is frackin' gorgeous! Very sporty. I like that a lot. (09-18-2014, 10:27 AM)Rboe_imp Wrote: I call the 2013 model; the Classic. The '10 model. The Original, and the best. The rest are sorta like Diet Coke. Better don the flak jacket. Cheers RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - gossman_imp - 09-18-2014 (09-18-2014, 11:24 AM)Pterodactyl_imp Wrote:(09-18-2014, 07:01 AM)Papa Weeley_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 09:43 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 08:18 AM)ClassicVW_imp Wrote: I could have bought either a '13 or a '14. I chose the '13 because I really like the overall look better, the wheels, the 1/2 black engine. The smaller side covers. The only concern I had was would I be riding and looking for a 6th gear like I do with my Honda NT? Well, the NT is a two cylinder, so the revs are higher. I do not look for a 6th at all on my CB. The revs are fine where I cruise at, and I have no vibrations at all. Even if I had bought a '13 without seeing a '14 and I later lusted after a '14, no way would I part with an extra $5500 just to get one. I work too hard for my money. Just me. YMMV.Exactly the same here. Both models available at the dealer. To me, the 13 is just looks slightly better. I may be odd man out, but I love the silver side covers with the red tank. Maybe because that was the way the original prototype looked, several years back. I still have the downloaded image on my computer today. In fact, I edited it to add the one thing I thought was missing from the design. Can y'all spot my Photoshop (actually Xara) add on? That sir, is frackin' gorgeous! Very sporty. I like that a lot. (09-18-2014, 10:27 AM)Rboe_imp Wrote: I call the 2013 model; the Classic. The '10 model. The Original, and the best. The rest are sorta like Diet Coke. Better don the flak jacket. Cheers
RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - Randy B - 09-18-2014 (09-18-2014, 11:24 AM)Pterodactyl_imp Wrote:(09-18-2014, 07:01 AM)Papa Weeley_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 09:43 AM)DGShannon_imp Wrote:(09-17-2014, 08:18 AM)ClassicVW_imp Wrote: I could have bought either a '13 or a '14. I chose the '13 because I really like the overall look better, the wheels, the 1/2 black engine. The smaller side covers. The only concern I had was would I be riding and looking for a 6th gear like I do with my Honda NT? Well, the NT is a two cylinder, so the revs are higher. I do not look for a 6th at all on my CB. The revs are fine where I cruise at, and I have no vibrations at all. Even if I had bought a '13 without seeing a '14 and I later lusted after a '14, no way would I part with an extra $5500 just to get one. I work too hard for my money. Just me. YMMV.Exactly the same here. Both models available at the dealer. To me, the 13 is just looks slightly better. I may be odd man out, but I love the silver side covers with the red tank. Maybe because that was the way the original prototype looked, several years back. I still have the downloaded image on my computer today. In fact, I edited it to add the one thing I thought was missing from the design. Can y'all spot my Photoshop (actually Xara) add on? And being the first you I hope you have the bug repellent handy.....those are always the worst.....bugs into everything.
2013 vs. 2014 - Cormanus - 09-18-2014 Which means that the 2011 must be the cream of the crop.
RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - barefootbrad_imp - 09-18-2014 Ya'll are missing the point entirely ! You buy the bike that is closest to what you like and (one of my favorite words) MODIFY it !!! I don't want to go buy a bike and leave it just like everyone elses...... Nor do I like riding the same thing every day, probobly why I'm up to ten bikes...... (geez, time to sell one....) RE: 2013 vs. 2014 - rboe - 09-18-2014 Seems to me, with ten bikes, you don't know what you like..... ![]() ![]() ( I used to tell my wife and friends when asked how many bikes I wanted, that ten was nice round number, now, after peaking at four, two sounds much better but I'm stuck at three for now. Royal pain keeping four in good working order )
2013 vs. 2014 - grover_imp - 09-19-2014 Seems to me with 10 bikes, you're living the dream!! ![]() I'd be like Jay Leno if I had his kind of money! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |