+- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Other Stuff (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Other Bikes (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: BMW boxers (/showthread.php?tid=6926)
RE: BMW boxers - GoldOxide_imp - 11-22-2018
( ... as long as nothing touches cotton ... fart away. )
RE: BMW boxers - dbarkdoll_imp - 11-23-2018
Question for those of you that have ridden a boxer twin, as I have not. Are the engine vibrations less than your average V-twin/parallel twin? Isn’t that kinda the whole point of the boxer design? I suppose it varies from bike to bike, but overall.
RE: BMW boxers - redbirds_imp - 11-23-2018
(11-23-2018, 12:49 PM)dbarkdoll_imp Wrote: Question for those of you that have ridden a boxer twin, as I have not. Are the engine vibrations less than your average V-twin/parallel twin? Isn’t that kinda the whole point of the boxer design? I suppose it varies from bike to bike, but overall.
My R75 was very smooth and a comfortable ride. I rented a R1200 GS in Texas a few years ago and found it equally comfortable. The piston movement of the boxer layout effectively cancels any annoying vibration.
RE: BMW boxers - VLJ_imp - 11-23-2018
Yes, the Boxer motor is smoother than most V or L Twins, and most parallel Twins. In particular, parallel Twins tend to be quite vibey, unless they're equipped with internal balance shafts. The Boxer is inherently smoother. That being said, the Triumph Bonneville T120 with the counterbalanced 1200cc parallel Twin is smoother than any of my Boxer-equipped BMWs ever were.
In general, however, if you have no problem with the typical vibration levels of V/L Twins or parallel Twins, you certainly won't have a vibration issue with any modern BMW boxer motor.
RE: BMW boxers - LongRanger_imp - 11-24-2018
In my experience, all of my boxers have been disappointing beyond normal highway speed. The worst was my R1100S, which vibrated annoyingly above 70-75 mph. That's the primary reason I sold it, which was a shame because it handled great and had all the elements to be a great sporty sport-tourer. My R850R wasn't as bad at those speeds, perhaps due to its lower displacement (same stroke as the 1100 but with a smaller bore), but nothing to be proud of. My former '08 RT and current '15 RT were better, but nowhere as smooth as a big inline-4, and nowhere close to my CB. By point of comparison, both my former Ducati 620 Monster (transverse L twin) and Moto Guzzi V7 (longitudinal V twin) were pure velvet at higher speeds. A little recalcitrant down low, but absolutely wonderful at 5000+ rpm.
RE: BMW boxers - GoldOxide_imp - 11-24-2018
... and we have a boxer match.
RE: BMW boxers - Offroad - 11-24-2018
I considered a 1200 when searching for a true sport touring bike.....but after being spoiled by the smoothness of the CBs in-line four I just couldn't see myself happy with a twin....so I went for the k1600 6 cyl.
It is a big heavy bike that is only happy when it's moving....but once rolling it's a dream.
If they fall over....IMHO That's what insurance is for....minus the $500 deductible :-(
RE: BMW boxers - GoldOxide_imp - 11-25-2018
Any six pack is a serious ride in so many ways.
RE: BMW boxers - Riko_imp - 11-28-2018
(11-24-2018, 04:40 PM)offroadfx4_imp Wrote: I considered a 1200 when searching for a true sport touring bike.....but after being spoiled by the smoothness of the CBs in-line four I just couldn't see myself happy with a twin....so I went for the k1600 6 cyl.
It is a big heavy bike that is only happy when it's moving....but once rolling it's a dream.
If they fall over....IMHO That's what insurance is for....minus the $500 deductible :-(
never thought back to my CB when riding my current so called L twin
That twin is so smooth its pefect for days of touring and crusing, if you want.
Because, it can be brutal at the same time.
Never ridden the S1000XR 4 cylinder, but its notorious for its vibrations...
Twins are buzy and 4 cylinders are smooth doesn't apply all the time every time, imo.
RE: BMW boxers - GoldOxide_imp - 11-28-2018
(11-28-2018, 06:17 AM)Riko_imp Wrote:(11-24-2018, 04:40 PM)offroadfx4_imp Wrote: I considered a 1200 when searching for a true sport touring bike.....but after being spoiled by the smoothness of the CBs in-line four I just couldn't see myself happy with a twin....so I went for the k1600 6 cyl.
It is a big heavy bike that is only happy when it's moving....but once rolling it's a dream.
If they fall over....IMHO That's what insurance is for....minus the $500 deductible :-(
never thought back to my CB when riding my current so called L twin
That twin is so smooth its pefect for days of touring and crusing, if you want.
Because, it can be brutal at the same time.
Never ridden the S1000XR 4 cylinder, but its notorious for its vibrations...
Twins are buzy and 4 cylinders are smooth doesn't apply all the time every time, imo.
never thought back to my CB when riding my current so called L twin
That twin is so smooth its pefect for days of touring and crusing, if you want.
Because, it can be brutal at the same time.
Never ridden the S1000XR 4 cylinder, but its notorious for its vibrations...
Twins are buzy and 4 cylinders are smooth doesn't apply all the time every time, imo.
Every bike I every rode had a "mood". Sometimes it just wasn't understood, but some days it felt less than good. My best guess was when I gawked at another sweet one. So jealousy or sumthin'.