![]() |
|
Symmetry - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Symmetry (/showthread.php?tid=3262) |
RE: Symmetry - calamarichris_imp - 02-19-2014 Sure, symmetry is prettier to our eyes, but a 4-into-1 is more efficient. Those higher-frequency exhaust pulses help pull each other out the muffler faster. You might not want the added smoothness & power, but that extra efficiency will also result in better mileage. RE: Symmetry - the Ferret - 02-19-2014 Its all relative Chris...who is going to get better performance and mileage..a guy 6'4 250 on a standard with a 4 into 1 .... or a guy 5'7" 170 on a Deluxe with a 4 into 2? If I wanted fuel mileage I'd buy an NC 700, if I wanted performance I'd buy a Aprilia RSV4 Like Guth said a CB 1100 isn't about performance.
Symmetry - Cormanus - 02-19-2014 I'm with the symmetry guys. The Deluxe is certainly a lovely creature to behold. RE: Symmetry - calamarichris_imp - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 07:27 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: Its all relative Chris...who is going to get better performance and mileage..a guy 6'4 250 on a standard with a 4 into 1 .... or a guy 5'7" 170 on a Deluxe with a 4 into 2? FIFY. ![]() Haha--I kid because I love. (And sometimes I love a little too much.) RE: Symmetry - the Ferret - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 07:37 AM)calamarichris_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 07:27 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: Its all relative Chris...who is going to get better performance and mileage..a guy 6'4 250 on a standard with a 4 into 1 .... or a guy 5'7" 170 on a Deluxe with a 4 into 2? FIFY. ![]() Haha--I kid because I love. (And sometimes I love a little too much.)
RE: Symmetry - Buffalohead_imp - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 06:40 AM)Guth_imp Wrote: That Hurricane was one eye-catching bike. I agree. 4 into 2 looks best. I always wondered why they didn't make it that way back in the day. RE: Symmetry - redbirds_imp - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 08:06 AM)Buffalohead_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 06:40 AM)Guth_imp Wrote: That Hurricane was one eye-catching bike. I agree. 4 into 2 looks best. I always wondered why they didn't make it that way back in the day. Guess I'm the odd man here, I much prefer the 4 into 1 and the non-pleated seat. RE: Symmetry - Buffalohead_imp - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 06:49 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 06:19 AM)HikerToo_imp Wrote: Ferret, as others have eluded too, maybe you can put a fake chain and sprocket on the right side also, will make it look even more even. Symmetry. It makes you wonder how many females the male lion would get if you shaved off one side of his mane!
RE: Symmetry - Deanohh_imp - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 08:12 AM)Buffalohead_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 06:49 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 06:19 AM)HikerToo_imp Wrote: Ferret, as others have eluded too, maybe you can put a fake chain and sprocket on the right side also, will make it look even more even. Symmetry. It makes you wonder how many females the male lion would get if you shaved off one side of his mane! if symmetry was so essential you'd have to have a sidecar on both sides. Symmetry - Cormanus - 02-19-2014 (02-19-2014, 08:06 AM)Buffalohead_imp Wrote:(02-19-2014, 06:40 AM)Guth_imp Wrote: That Hurricane was one eye-catching bike. Cause 4 into 4 was symmetrical and looked pretty good too. Particularly whey wanted to make the point that this bike had 4 cylinders. |