![]() |
|
2013 vs 2017 - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: 2013 vs 2017 (/showthread.php?tid=1582) |
RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Ulvetanna_imp - 01-26-2018 (01-26-2018, 06:20 AM)VLJ_imp Wrote:(01-21-2018, 03:40 AM)Ulvetanna_imp Wrote:(01-21-2018, 03:27 AM)baxtercat_imp Wrote: Totally agree, MTC. to the OP's question: no, I don't think the 2017 has gone in the wrong direction, if those extra 20 pounds make no difference to the handling.Suspension and powertrain are refined to the degree where the weight is masked. Some of the weight is fuel, too, about six pounds. To test ride? Or to purchase? I don't recall where you live, but if all you need is a test ride to get you off the fence, hey, what comes around goes around. Just as Eric helped me out, I would be happy to let you take an all-day test ride on my new '17. Quote:Gonna wait and see if Honda bring in the RS. Thought you'd pretty much decided that you don't see any real advantage to the RS, so you were going to stick with the cheaper, more comfortable, easier steering EX? Correct, EX all the way! I'm a long haul from your area, but do appreciate the offer! RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Hondahawkrider_imp - 01-26-2018 A riding buddy once complained about a later model gaining a few extra lbs at a bike show..Unfortunately, he made the comment in front of his wife, who i swear patted his stomach and said “just like you, honey” I near died from laughing After than I quit worrying about bike weight. While it’s nice to say new models should be better, better isn’t always lighter.. RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Tezza_imp - 01-26-2018 Down here in OZ we an only dream of anything past 2013. RE: 2013 vs 2017 - flynrider - 01-26-2018 I'd feel sorry for you, but next year (or this year) aren't you going to be able to import individual bikes? You'll not only have access to the CB1100, but also bikes that we never see in North America like the CB1300 and CB400SF. RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Bheezy27403_imp - 01-26-2018 Ahh the CB400SF. Could you guys please quit bringing up this bike.
RE: 2013 vs 2017 - emptysea - 01-26-2018 LOL. I feel the same way, Bheezy. Actually, about both the 400 and the 1300. Frustrating that we can't have them here. Still, I'd rather talk about those bikes and why they should be in the US than talk about the Kawi Z900RS ad nauseam RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Cormanus - 01-26-2018 We’ve had both the CB400 and the CB1300 in the past. No more. RE: 2013 vs 2017 - Bheezy27403_imp - 01-26-2018 (01-26-2018, 03:51 PM)EmptySea_imp Wrote: LOL. I feel the same way, Bheezy. Actually, about both the 400 and the 1300. Frustrating that we can't have them here. Still, I'd rather talk about those bikes and why they should be in the US than talk about the Kawi Z900RS ad nauseam ![]() RE: 2013 vs 2017 - pdedse - 01-26-2018 (01-26-2018, 06:20 AM)VLJ_imp Wrote:(01-21-2018, 03:40 AM)Ulvetanna_imp Wrote:(01-21-2018, 03:27 AM)baxtercat_imp Wrote: Totally agree, MTC. to the OP's question: no, I don't think the 2017 has gone in the wrong direction, if those extra 20 pounds make no difference to the handling.Suspension and powertrain are refined to the degree where the weight is masked. Some of the weight is fuel, too, about six pounds. Well, HELLOOOOO, neighbor! RE: 2013 vs 2017 - VLJ_imp - 01-27-2018 Need a test ride, pdedse? |