![]() |
|
defects CB 1100 - Printable Version +- The CB1100 Community Forum (https://cb1100forum.net/forum) +-- Forum: Honda CB1100 Discussions (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=5) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://cb1100forum.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: defects CB 1100 (/showthread.php?tid=734) |
RE: defects CB 1100 - j3gq_imp - 12-03-2020 (12-03-2020, 05:29 PM)Olof_imp Wrote: The headline is 'defects' but we're discussing preferences, by definition a personal thing. This has already been stated (several times), but to me preferences are also fluid if I'm motivated. Like this tune a lot, and I will certainly have to figure out in spring whether I am already doing the 'peg steering' intuitively (without being aware of it), or whether this will become a trick for my toolbox. RE: defects CB 1100 - rboe - 12-05-2020 Declaring a bike uncomfortable is very subjective; we all bend differently. Ones height is not the full story either, Inseam, arm length - both are very important. Big bum and small bum probably has a fair amount of bearing too. Being in shape to ride long rides is huge. Which is why the ride home is usually a lot easier than the ride out - you got pummelled into shape! ![]() I'm beginning to understand why folks will trailer a bike to a destination....... RE: defects CB 1100 - the Ferret - 12-05-2020 (12-05-2020, 11:36 AM)Rboe_imp Wrote: Declaring a bike uncomfortable is very subjective; we all bend differently. Ones height is not the full story either, Inseam, arm length - both are very important. Big bum and small bum probably has a fair amount of bearing too. Probably why I have no issues with stock seats or long hours in the saddle. Nearly daily riding since 1965 has kept my bum and body pummelled into " riding shape" RE: defects CB 1100 - GoldOxide_imp - 12-05-2020 I wonder if it wasn't for the Iron Butt Association, if today it would instead be called the "Hard-@ssed Association"? (given that over the decades many words have been relaxed) defects CB 1100 - IndianRider_imp - 12-07-2020 (11-24-2020, 04:27 PM)Ale72_imp Wrote: thank you guys. This the the most ridiculous post I have ever seen on this forum even if I have traveled far and seen many cultures and barriers including half of Italy and I love Italians. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: defects CB 1100 - Cormanus - 12-07-2020 I'm sure you've noticed that it's been the subject of some discussion already, IndianRider. I regret not deleting it when I first saw it. RE: defects CB 1100 - rboe - 12-08-2020 To be fair, considering his tall stature, it's an easy knee jerk assumption to make. Once a little bit of thoughtful reflection (and some added data from concerned forum members) one can see the folly in the statement. I know over the years I've said some pretty dumb things not knowing the full picture. Alas; I don't seem to avoid that pitfal - but I seem to do it less. ![]() So I'd cut him some slack. RE: defects CB 1100 - the Ferret - 12-08-2020 I have heard that statement (minus the Chinese part) for 50 years. That these bikes are built for short Japanese riders that weigh 150 pounds. This is nothing new. Dont believe the statement to be true, but it's nothing we haven't heard for decades. Unfortunately it's hard to design/build bikes that fit 5'5" guys like me, and 6'4" guys like Longranger or Rboe, and guys that weigh 130 and guys that weigh 250. That's how the aftermarket got its start, making bike built for the middle, to fit guys on the opposing ends of the height/ weight spectrum. RE: defects CB 1100 - LongRanger_imp - 12-08-2020 6’6”. 6’4”, I wish! RE: defects CB 1100 - Houtman_imp - 12-08-2020 Rboe , I still say dumb things at seventy years old . |