01-23-2025, 01:41 AM
I'd say as you already have a '17 which has the dual bending valve forks...and you only weigh 150lbs- I'd probably just keep the stock rear shocks in that situation.
(01-22-2025, 09:11 PM)Aussieflyer_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Hey Rdprdp01,
Ramblings of a bored old man follow...
Many owners have ridden huge mileage and are satisfied with the standard rear shocks. If it aint broke, don't fix it comes to mind. Although the stock shocks were comfortable they were a little under damped causing the occasional wallow so I went the other way and changed stuff just for the fun of it. My relevant learnings from an 'upgrade' of rear suspension are summarised below.
- no matter how fast you think you are we are street riders on the street, not racers on a track.
- aftermarket 'performance' suspension is usually focused for racing / track application.
- tracks are relatively smooth without the potholes and sharp edge bumps of streets.
- racing / track application suspension needs to manage braking, cornering and acceleration loads the occasional ripple or undulations but not potholes.
- adjustable suspension (preload, compression and rebound) is usually limited to the 'low speed' dampening and often via small / thin valved bypass openings.
- performance shocks 'high speed' dampening is usually relatively heavily damped as required to manage cornering loads.
- performance shocks look cool but even when correctly sprung for rider and bike weight they may not be ideal for rough streets.
- my performance shocks required re-valving to dramatically reduce high speed dampening.
- my shocks now run 0 weight fluid at zero rebound and zero compression dampening settings to achieve adequate comfort on the street.
Upgrading suspension is worthwhile however best results for street application may come from aftermarket shocks intended for street riding not track riding. As a bonus they may be the cheaper option.
Good luck with your project

(01-22-2025, 10:49 PM)m in sc_imp Wrote: [ -> ]i agree, race shocks aren't needed. shocks wear over time, the oil wears out, its a service item. Mos tpeople as stated, gradually get used to it and think they are just fine. The trick is to learn what a sacked out shock (or fork) feels like. Like said, mine were getting wallowy at 10k or so. when i realized it i was in the mts with my wife on the back.. and yes, riding fast. now, 99% of the time you wont feel it. However, IF you hit a bad section of road and you have a 'comfy' but worn shock, not riding fast or spiritied, its too late. It is a safety item. But it also ergonomically will help over time when the suspension does what its supposed to do.
Thanks for taking the time to write the post. David(01-23-2025, 01:41 AM)PowerDubs_imp Wrote: [ -> ]I'd say as you already have a '17 which has the dual bending valve forks...and you only weigh 150lbs- I'd probably just keep the stock rear shocks in that situation.
David(02-08-2025, 06:21 AM)The ferret_imp Wrote: [ -> ]what is an active oil cooler?
(01-22-2025, 04:50 PM)Rdprdp01_imp Wrote: [ -> ]My friends, I could use some coaching. I deeply admire great engineering and hold tradesman in equally high regard. I can usually recognize fine products when I see them.
I have followed this particular thread with great interest. The links were fascinating to review because it appears to me that there are significantly different approaches to motorcycle suspension system from leading suppliers.
Tev62 post was very informative.
http://epmperformance.com/products/shock...-2014-2018
I have seen these shocks on sport tourers and baggers. They are beautiful, and when I asked riders about them, their response has always been incredibly favorable. Now that I see the costs, part of that enthusiasm may be in part to assure themselves that the cost is justified.
I was also very impressed that Frankenstein has had a long, rewarding history with IKON 761 on the many motorcycles he has owned and upgraded. Although I have never seen an IKON 761 “in person,” it is obvious that Frankenstein has great insight and experience, just like Tev62.
My problem is that I am ignorant. I know how to wrench, and I know how to research. I know how to ride, and I am confident, experienced motorcyclist.
But I have never, ever ridden a motorcycle which has had a suspension upgrade. I also find the stock system on a CB1100 comfortable. That opinion, I fear, may be related to my lack of experience and knowledge about suspension systems.
Here are my goals. I welcome any guidance or direction you care to share.
I want to do everything which is reasonable to make the riding experience on my 2017 CB1100EX comfortable. I like a neutral ride. I enjoy the sport feel of my motorcycle, but I also want to limit stress and strain on my body over the years I plan to ride. My rides rarely exceed 100 miles in a day. Riding two up is a very rare experience for me. Finally, i travel light. 15 Lbs of luggage is a heavy load. Often, it is just me, a helmet, and protective gear. I am 5’11” tall and I weigh 152 LBs. I estimate my boots, pants, jacket, gloves, and helmet add another 10-12 LBs.
For those of you in the know, what susoension system upgrades should I consider if any given my riding habits and goals? Should I just accept the OEM system I have now until such time there is a true problem I can articulate? Would a suspension upgrade take my riding experience from very good to fantastic? If you have time, I welcome your response. Thanks in advance. David
. These forks were an upgrade to the pre 2017 bikes and they appear as expensive "suspension upgrades" on a number of Harleys. So for me I think they are very good even though they offer no damping adjustment.