(12-21-2015, 05:38 PM)Cormanus_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Apropos numbers manufactured, you could hazard a guess for the US market based on the US data in the Registry.
The highest VIN for a 2013 is 1785—so round it up to 1800; for the 2013 ABS it's 1069—say 1100; for the 2014 STD it's 2460—say 2500; and for the DLX it's 299—say 300.
That would mean 2900 bikes in 2013 and 2800 in 2014 just in the US.
What about the 716 2013s non-abs? - so round DOWN to say 700 because they apparently don't count LOL.
BTW, if the ser# is based on model dependency (from other post), why is mine 1068? I think the entire VIN# sequence is more cryptic than logical or consistent. It is only unique.
(12-21-2015, 10:35 PM)rbike_imp Wrote: [ -> ] (12-21-2015, 05:38 PM)Cormanus_imp Wrote: [ -> ]Apropos numbers manufactured, you could hazard a guess for the US market based on the US data in the Registry.
The highest VIN for a 2013 is 1785—so round it up to 1800; for the 2013 ABS it's 1069—say 1100; for the 2014 STD it's 2460—say 2500; and for the DLX it's 299—say 300.
That would mean 2900 bikes in 2013 and 2800 in 2014 just in the US.
What about the 716 2013s non-abs? - so round DOWN to say 700 because they apparently don't count LOL.
BTW, if the ser# is based on model dependency (from other post), why is mine 1068? I think the entire VIN# sequence is more cryptic than logical or consistent. It is only unique.
What about the 716 2013s non-abs? - so round DOWN to say 700 because they apparently don't count LOL.
BTW, if the ser# is based on model dependency (from other post), why is mine 1068? I think the entire VIN# sequence is more cryptic than logical or consistent. It is only unique.
You've lost me mate.